HD is needed because of HD movies, PS3 uses disc's for that, 360 doesnt have a blu ray drive, so it definitely needs a HD for that stuff.
Oh, and a 360 does everything a ps3 does.
You name one thing the ps3 does, the 360 absolutely cant do because of hardware limitations.
Thats doesnt take away my right of calling it gf280.
And it also doesnt mean i am the only one calling it that way.
And third, I would understand if you complain about something that doesnt make sense.
But GF280 got plenty of logic, and is in no way senseless.
GF = Geforce
280 = 200 series.
What more logic do you need, you could have easily deciphered what i said, instead of pointlessly bashing, unless you are really that stupid that you can even fig...
Not really, its actually an excuse that ps3 users use, for claiming that PC gfx cannot be compared to ps3 gfx, because of the cost.
I bought and i7 with a Gf280 last november, the only upgrade i have in mind for the near future is a new video card.
I want to take advantage of DX11.
@below
gf = short for Geforce, thank you very much.
And the card i mentioned is from the 200 series, therefore i call it gf280.
Fable2 and Halo are not gfx games, but gameplay games.\Play gears 2. then Forza 3, and talk again.
Nothing wrong with taking a review as a base.
Cuz people who review generally know what they are talking about.
Otherwise noone would buy games mags.
Also, you people know i am right, the amount of energy you guys stick in trying to counter me says enough.
But keep on trying to hide the truth, if that makes you feel better.
@below
GTA4 is criticized for its story, smartass, not for its gfx, so AGAIN,. what does gameplay have to do with gfx? <...
What do graphics have to do with gameplay?
Besides, every game got lovers and haters, your example is weak.
@above, you shouldnt call yourself truth then, i have been a gamer for 22 years, have had systems from every manufacturer out there, including sony devices.
I can easily see difference between games, you guys just dont give a serious look to the games of the opposition, your biased.
Really, you wont hear me claim that game x poops on game y.
I am saying theres no difference in gfx if you compare AAA ps3 games to 360 AAA games.
Because all the reviews proof that.
I am one of the very few honest people here, that doesnt cream on his choice of purchase, unlike you guys.
@above, no, it doesnt.
@further above,
Reviewers are a games law yes, cause they dont look trough silly fanboy goggles, unlike you guys.
Like i said, i let the reviews talk, those proved they do look as good, and even better.
Your opinion is ass, cause your looking trough fanboy goggles.
@below
Yes, reviews stated that, and will state it for the games i mentioned.
If the ps3 was so much better looking, then 360 games wouldnt score so high on gfx.
Only, Blu ray doesnt account for the graphics, its the hardware that is sticking on the mobo that decides the gfx.
If you put crysis on a bluray disc, itl look the same as when you put it on dvd9.
Its already being done, Forza, Alan Wake, KUF2 and Mass effect2 for example.
These games will score 10's in reviews for gfx, and you guys can keep on blabbering about how you think they dont compare to uncharted, cause they compare more then enough.
@ignorant user above.
Use your damn eyes, put down the fanboy goggles.
Cus like i said, il let the reviews talk, your opinion doesnt give an ass to the way things are.
Keep crying people, il let the reviews do the talking, not the opinion of a bunch of ps3 fans.
Uncharted may be nice looking, but claiming the 360 cant do it is extremely ignorant.
Energy exist outside of the universe, nature does not, so energy does not fall under the law of nature.
The law of nature is actually a product that comes from energy.
As the laws are things like time, gravity, space, etch.
And those are composed of energy.
So i did not proof myself wrong, your perception and interpretation is wrong.
No it doesnt, when you break matter apart into energy, and then rebuild it into matter, it wont be the same as before.
Energy is the only consistent force in the universe, once matter is gone, it will never be back, cause the energy it was composed of, takes a different shape afterwards.
And energy can exist without matter, but matter cannot exist without energy.
Its even possible to build things solely composed of energy, while the same thing cannot be done wi...
Heat can be broken, as it requires gravity, and gravity, believe it or not, requires matter.
Your soul i would agree on, Souls are energy, and energy last forever.
Yes, Blackholes can only be sustained by matter, if all matter around a black hole is consumed, then a black hole will fall apart.
@LethalToxins
Its only broken from your perception.
From the perception of the universe its still not broken, because its still matter.
Human perception is only useful to humans, but theres more in the universe then humans.
For example, hand a working 360 to a dog, he will sit on it, or consider it to be something he ca...
It does have design flaws, otherwise there would be no developer or user on the planet that complains about it.
Theres plenty of people complaining about the ps3 its complexity, and its lack of accessible memory at a time.
But rest assured, when something is designed, theres always a budget in mind, which limits the freedom is designing something.
No object on this planet is flaw free, on the ps3 however, they did a good job on its stability.
While the 360 they ...
The sky can easily break, as its part of the atmosphere.
@above
Your wrong, all matter can be destroyed.
Its energy that cant be destroyed, and matter is created from energy.
Its a lifecycle, matter forms from energy, and eventually reverts back to energy.
Thank you for the people who explained that everything can break, even air can, cause its composed of particles.
For the rest of you, go back to school you dumbasses.
Not knowing anno2...
When you make jokes, your jokes should have somewhat of a connection with a real life subject.
Your jokes are just completely random and pulled out of thin air.
You would make the worst stand up comedian ever, even the real Peter north is funnier then you.
Actually, his problem is that he doesnt assume at all.
He got yards of papers with all kinds of numbers that does the predictions for him.
But you cant predict everything with math, somethimes you need a bit of common sense.
But the numbers are easier to defend in the media, your own common sense is not.