They got good press too, just not on here. I think it's a good idea with paying the ferryman and if your read the article, it's not REAL money so whats the problem?
I spoke to my nan after she read your opinion and she said "what a load of old shit" (sorry, that a Catherine Tate line but it seemed appropriate).
Lots of supposition and leaps of faith with f**k all to follow it up. So to be clear, this wasn't a good read and wasn't well put together because this reader didn't believe your conviction or experience.
It was like you were regurgitating what other people have written before and passed ...
Since when is combat the be all and end all of any game, it isn't. You think the game is shit and I think you're talking out of your arse. That's fair comment and there is nothing wrong with that.
As for scores, you and I know these are subjective. Basically we have users who quickly hammered the game or "sampled" the game and got a review out, because we all know that everyone needs to be told what is good bad, content light ...
OK how about this, I've been playing the game with my lads and we have had a right laugh, lots to do and it's very funny. Take a bit of tie to get the hang of it but your first battle is brilliant.
Guys I've finally got my physical copy for the shelf and my eldest has it on game pass, it's a little bit of a learning curve for me and my lads to keep talking while playing in our groups but it's brilliant.
This is such a great social game, just as advertised and I am looking forward to getting our additional dev-ops guys together in the infrastructure guys to have a good laugh through work on this.
As to the negatives on this page, I've...
2883d ago 5 agree3 disagreeView commentInappropriate
Yeah, if you take the toxic horseshit out of the equation you'd have a decent debate and better promotion for games
@mark_parch - I love the arrows on the articles, to think that some people care what others say on this website.
I always thought the point of the comments section was to say your piece. Doesn't say anything of about giving two f***s about whether people care or not.
It's like "Oh no, I don't like what that person has said... so I'll click this down arrow so that they know that I'm sad about it"
@_-EDMIX-_ Success for Rare - Jesus, they developed the game.
Why do people have to be such C**ts over a game they either don't want to play or can't play because they support pepsi over coke. This goes for both side of the debate and I use the word "debate" in the loosest terms.
I loved the idea of the game from the first video at e3 a few years ago and have loved every minute of the scale-up and now that its live.
Thanks MS
Again, not true
They got good press too, just not on here. I think it's a good idea with paying the ferryman and if your read the article, it's not REAL money so whats the problem?
@_-EDMIX-_ They didn't say they'd be charging people cash.
Have they said that they would do this?
No!
So what moan about something that hasn't happened.
@UCForce You said Rare and Microsoft have a lack of confidence with their game.
Where did you get this alleged fact from, I'd like to see it with a source from both parties if what you are saying is true.
If not, why write it?
Not for you, clearly!
I spoke to my nan after she read your opinion and she said "what a load of old shit" (sorry, that a Catherine Tate line but it seemed appropriate).
Lots of supposition and leaps of faith with f**k all to follow it up. So to be clear, this wasn't a good read and wasn't well put together because this reader didn't believe your conviction or experience.
It was like you were regurgitating what other people have written before and passed ...
@MakoD
Since when is combat the be all and end all of any game, it isn't. You think the game is shit and I think you're talking out of your arse. That's fair comment and there is nothing wrong with that.
As for scores, you and I know these are subjective. Basically we have users who quickly hammered the game or "sampled" the game and got a review out, because we all know that everyone needs to be told what is good bad, content light ...
Sorry MakoD but I think you're talking out of your arse! We've had nothing but fun and lots to do in this group game.
Destiny was rubbish because it sold itself as a traditional game with rpg elements and that turned out not to be true.
Sea of thieves was sold as a group game where the fun is had by enjoying the quests. There is a story but it's not been marketed that way.
I love this game and I have no doubt it'll get b...
OK how about this, I've been playing the game with my lads and we have had a right laugh, lots to do and it's very funny. Take a bit of tie to get the hang of it but your first battle is brilliant.
Good enough?
Yeah, if you take the toxic horseshit out of the equation you'd have a decent debate and better promotion for games
It's up to you. Ignore this guy, decide for yourselves and enjoy your games however you want
@mark_parch - I love the arrows on the articles, to think that some people care what others say on this website.
I always thought the point of the comments section was to say your piece. Doesn't say anything of about giving two f***s about whether people care or not.
It's like "Oh no, I don't like what that person has said... so I'll click this down arrow so that they know that I'm sad about it"
I'm sur...
Donald Trump doesn't watch family guy either... so you're in good company.
I suppose boring c**ts have stick together
I'd call you a bell3nd but I'm a lady... I'm not really
@_-EDMIX-_ Success for Rare - Jesus, they developed the game.
Why do people have to be such C**ts over a game they either don't want to play or can't play because they support pepsi over coke. This goes for both side of the debate and I use the word "debate" in the loosest terms.