I haev no interest in playing a black hipster in watch dogs 2, also didn't play the first one and the theme of the game "hacking" doesnt resonate with me. I was interested in mafia 3 and the color of the protagonists skin wasn't a deciding factor, back story, while cliche seemed like it could be interesting, I like the voice actor they got, but after watching gameplay and reading reviews I passed.
That would be dissapointing, I hope they actually do somethign interesting for the DLC
Bloodborne can be hard for players new to the series or switching over from the soul's series. That difficulty is meant to be overcome. If you actually beat the game and decided the play through it again it would likely take you half the time, because you learned something. You can also summon help if you need it, less so now that the game isn't quite as populated. You can also "grind" to level up to make the game easier. Don't have time? Not the games fault. Bloodbornes...
It is an indie, or it's not because it retailed for $60? Im confused.....................
I really hope this game tanks if it ever comes to pc after bungie prioritized 2 dead consoles over pc
I enjoy overwatch in small doses, but of all the fps I have played in my life and lost in, I have never felt less after losing a match than I do in overwatch. When I lose a 30 minute match of conquest in BF1 it sucks, the series engages you like other shooters cant. It lives up to its name, it's a battlefield simulator. Overwatch seems like a bunch of colorful characters playing together.
I want a fun game not a history lesson.
Did you play the second week? They sped it up, though admittedly they didn't capture the speed of the first game. I wonder what game you will play instead to get that fast paced fix, no one is playing the original anymore. I'm all aboard for TF2.
I think it is too soon to say with the slice of TF2 we have seen is if is truly worse than TF1. I read some reviews that seem to be based more on what a reviewer read than that reviewer playing the game. I loved the original. I don't like every design choice they have made but I had fun during both tech test weekends. Already pre ordered, which I don't normally do until a day before release.
Supposedly they are taking player skill into account a lot more, so I don't see why they couldn't have pc/console cross play. There are some scary console players out there who would destroy me, I play on PC. I had a friend who got titanfall 1, big halo player, used a controller the whole time on TF and was very close to me skill wise.
What? This isn't new. Destiny, COD, Battlefield, biggest dev teams and budgets I cant think of and DLC is par for the course. Your article should have been No Man's Sky owners, a bitter pill to swallow after seeing what they got for 60 bucks.
Not a bonus if you charge for it.
I think the issues is that the first game was very rewarding to players who weren't good or "casual." The titan timer and being able to contribute to the team by playing objective and killing grunts/spectres, and having your titan in auto mode. You didn't have to be good at fps' at all. So for me it seems like a step back. Lastly they are trying to appeal to a larger crowd, mainly COD players I guess, so i don't know why they would make the game harder, as COD is gea...
I think it's good for Respawn and Dice that EA isn't setting unobtainable sales estimates.
Yup , let them make their own game. There are plenty of other co op shooter campaigns you can play.
Is this guy making a movie or a game?
What book is he referrring to a 9:46, I can't understand him, Thanks!
Respawn also just announced that PC players will be left out of the technical test. This is announced days before they release tech test dates. Shitty console port incoming. (Nothing against consoles, love that PS4 players are going to get to play too, am refferring to the game not being optomized for PC)
Sean Murray is a liar. Anyone who still thinks there won't be paid DLC is an idiot, and those idiots will buy it too.
Guy's voice is awful to listen to.