I've always been a gamer, but When the N64 came out I walk away from gaming: I was at a very demanding high-school, and need to focus on my studies. So I don't really like, the N64 classics: Ocarina, Majora, Mario Kart, Smash, etc.
I've tried them through emulators over the years, but not a big fan of the N64 really.
I think the Snes has a waaaay better library. (But maybe is just a nostalgia thing)
Except perhaps Mario 64 (that game is a master piece)
So is it coming to the PS4?
- Visually gorgeous
- Exploration and Missions are fun (lots of them)
- Story missions repetitive
- human villages sparse, underdeveloped and empty
Sengoku Hyme 1,2,3,4?
scared?
1. Demo: empty, boring repetitive
2. RAD engine 4.0
3. No multiplayer at all
4. Output: 1080p 30fps
5. Collector Edition: a statue, soundtrack, Dlc, Steelbook
6. February retail version???
7. ??????
What's the new Rare game?
I haven't tried this one. The reviews are rather weird, some people loved it and some hated it! But the weird part is that they love or hate this game for the exact same reasons.
This has been a great year for gaming: I love Isolation, Destiny, Mario Kart, Shadows of M, (I haven't tried Dragon Age, Bayonetta 2 or the ones in the Bone)
This is the best game I've played this year. And I agree, the atmosphere was superb: they've made a love letter to the fans of the movies.
"I'm just chilling here at the Quan long cafe, man, you got a problem?"
Ubisoft is a crappy company no doubt about it, but what about videogame journalism?
All news sites obeyed the embargo, and they knew this was a broken game (at least on consoles); broken (I'm not against a reasonable journalism embargo for a supposedly "bad game") , what kind of journalism is that?: I won't warn my readers cause Ubisoft would get mad and won't send me any more free early copies in the future?
I can understand that from an independent journalist; but IGN, Kotaku, Gspot, Eurogamer etc. Those are really big sites, if just one of them decided to disobey the embargo people would know who to trust (the guy in this article talks about a "broken game" here not just a bad one)... They don't need free copies; besides Ubisoft wouldn't dare not to send them free early copies (that would be real bad publicity from one of this sites)
Ubisoft: 2nd crappiest company of the year (EA takes the prize as always) BUT
There's just one thing i can't understand! if journalists knew this game was broken (and I mean broken not just bad):
- why did they obey the review embargo?
- isn't that unethical?...
So Is not just about what we the gamers can do; this guy is saying "I knew the game was broken but we couldn't say that because Ubisoft would get mad at us" ...
Crappiest video game company of the year goes to...
Lowest score I've seen for this game
A love letter to the fans (of the movies)
Best game I played this year
You'll get the prize this year Ubi, and you will show them... crappiest company on earth
So this game has online issues? The Fanboys are unbelievable; I've read like 20 comments saying that they weren't experiencing any sort of troubles (I begin to think that it was internet trolling): But even the MS Honcho says so. I mean WTF people: be honest.
It goes to boths sides mtfkrs