Wow AAA DLC
Seams like MS got AAA content for every gaming medium
Whats that suppose to mean!?
Super Mario Galaxy 97
97>>>>95
Or did you forget how to count
No, but i'd rather go by a large collective of (mostly) unbiased opinions rather than a PS3 fanboy's opinion
Considering that the 360 has 20 games over the 90 mark at meta compared to the 11 on the PS3 I think its pretty clear that graphics dont help a huge amount when in comes to making a great game
Cause i bet Pacman is more fun to play than Haze is
Bioshock 96
Half Life 2 96
Halo 3 94
COD4 94
∨
∨
∨
∨
Killzone 2 92 (post gameinformer and gamesTM reviews)
So no, not by a long shot.
Maybe on the PS3 but this gen!? Dont fool yourself
I guess you'll be buying it then
Didnt GameInformer give Halo Wars a 9 or was it a 9.25 which was higher than even the almighty Killzone 2, so dont count HW out yet its got too many good previews not to be AAA
Well if the past years are anything to go by it will be the year of the 360 yet again, but it will be a close call if GOW3,GT5 and Zelda all come out this year
Its just an extended version of the original trailer and although it looks good it still lacks the WOW factor that Killzone 2 has
So why does everyone say that Halo 3 is crap, it was overhyped and it still got great scores
What do you expect, when they get outsold they always tout that year-on-year increase nonsense
But this time not even that spin is available for them
On a side note: i dont see how this story is lame when a professional site like mcvuk found the need to create it
But are Edge really doing it for hits?
I thought they were more of a magazine than a website, since their actual site is more business based than review based
At first glance it may seem like the 7 was the sole reason for the sudden decrease but when you look at Halo 3 it also has a 7 yet its still sits comfortably at 94
The reason Killzone 2 is only at 92 is because the majority of reviewer gave it 9's rather than 10's and with every 9 posted that averaged slowly comes down so its not just Edge's fault it was a group effort from the whole gaming media
When an underhyped game scores better than an overhyped game thats when you know its a good game
It will certainly effect 1st and 2nd party devs (R2 graphics wont be acceptable anymore), but 3rd parties likely wont bother unless Sony pays them
I just dont see any 3rd party putting the money and effort into unlocking the true power of the PS3 when the game will likely be an exclusive so they probably wouldnt get their money back in sales
Wow didnt realize how basic this site is
I mean being able to create an account with the exact same name is just stupid
But i thought the PS3 was better value!?
Didnt Sony make a chart saying the 360 was more expensive or does that not matter now?
5 disagrees from what!?
Its not like i said they gave Killzone 2 an 8 making 360 DLC better than a full game did i!
Talk about touchy fanboys