I do wonder if the game ever looked like that in motion since those pics looked pretty static and touched up. But I will only be bothered about the graphics if the story fail, which it shouldnt.
Forget Windows, Mac Snow Leopard FTW!
Cant wait till September
Some sites need to be seriously banned from N4G, examiner is becoming the new HHG. But unlikely HHG examiner posts hit seeking articles 24/7.
Halo 3 rushed!? RUSHED!? It was supposed to be a launch game, it was delayed like 2/3 times!!
How did they manage that?
Arent the installs meant to reduce loading time, if they are compressing stuff the loading would get bigger.
Seems like MS are doing the impossible, no wonder they didnt back bluray
lol
Damn I didnt think the comment I made would cause so much trouble, its not like I wrote it in a PS3 article. And obviously im not referring to ALL 360 exclusives, but to try and counter by mentioning PS3 software sales is just embarrassing, seriously.
With all these rumors it will be more of a shock if it comes out in 2010 than 2009.
Still Dec seems a bit a late for the game to reach its full potential in terms of sales, late Nov is their best bet.
360 exclusives sure love to sell like hotcakes, this game hasnt even been out for a year yet
This is so painful to watch, but at least someone was able to make a positive spin :)
"the PS3 has tallied 24.6 million units
Microsoft has sold 30.2 million"
What an epic fail even before they get to their predictions
I wonder how big that number would be if it cost the same as XBL. What would be even more interesting is how large would the XBL community would be if it was free.
Just goes to show people would rather pay for a quality service.
@ peeps
I will tell you why the PS3s framerate bothers me, its because if they have to downgrade the 360 version to 30fps just because the PS3 cant handle PC ports I will be quite pissed.
@ deep
No just no, you can stop right there
I doubt that, when has a game which is a PC port ever turned out well on the PS3 (The Orange Box/Fallout).
A solid 30fps maybe but 60? Very doubtful
Who needs a time machine when you got common sense
Edit: @ AclayPS3
The 360 is more expensive than the PS3, Sony have even stated that themselves with that chart they made, so dont bother with the "the PS3 is double the price" cause that excuse if an epic fail on your part.
It doesnt matter its still a massive gap which even Sony themselves said they couldnt close till about 5 years, but that probably wont happen anyway.
The PS3 will remain behind the 360 thats a fact.
I doesnt matter how much the 360 outsells the PS3 as long as it does. 0.1ml is just adding to that 8ml+ lead that the PS3 will never close.
If it wasnt thanks to the PS2 the PS3 would have gone the way of the dreamcast by now, its fanbase is quite powerful just not strong enough
@ Charmers
They expect you to install 25GB thats crazy
@ Cwalat
"360 version of Rage - which uses id's new Tech 5 engine - matches the 60fps framerate of the PC version, while PS3 runs at just "20-30fps"."
Its not locked at 30fps so expect a lot of framerate drops. Swapping disks is nothing compared to that especially for a FPS.
So the question is what would you rather have a smooth 60fps game or no 1 sec disk swapping hmmm...
Edit: Still waiting for the first multiplatform title which is actually on par/better than its 360 counterpart
Anyone know how many disks the PC version will be cause i think thats on DVD too, would be quite funny if the obviously superior version comes on multiple disks lol.
At least now the loss doesnt look as bad as it could have
I thought it would have been more popular than that. But then again beta are pretty rare on the PS3 so I guess only the pre-order people got through.
I thought it was at 23.8ml or something like that.
I wonder if sony will ever be able to surpass its predecessor's installbase like what both MS and Nintendo have done. Until that day comes I can still see those "PS3 is doomed" articles appearing.