Totally agree, thats exactly what I reckon. Why not start an organization of publishers that retailers need to pay membership to in order to sell their products second hand, or something like that
Yeah I agree on some on the structure, it could have possibly used a bit more of a casual career mode as well.
I thought that was a pretty funny take on the way they do it in some cartoons
... what these guys are doing, these videos are just awesome. I hope they never stop making them!
I don't know if Reach is the best of the series (for it's time I mean) but I seem to be having more fun with this one than any of the ones before it.
There are rumors that this is all a very inappropriate PR stunt. If that's the case then users might be not feel like laughing at the joke.
I guess you are right, I thought about it while writing the comment and it was probably just a poor choice of words. The game was something for its time, but times have definitely changed.
It's kinda cool for someone like me who hasn't played the original, to see what the fuss was about. The screenshots and videos don't look that bad either, so this could be worth some bucks.
She is right about everyone starting as casual gamers (although I think some Halo players were, in fact, born that way) but still, if you belittle them, they won't carry on and flourish into seasoned tea-baggers
Yeah, while I also think it's pretty funny, you would think that they were happy enough with their product to have to resort to this sort of thing.
No in this case the local distributor sent the link of the review to Activision (as they usually do when reviews are posted) and were met with a big surprise when Acti replied
It's a decent score, but the review talks about quite a few small issues that keep it from being as good as Arkham Asylum.
I am author of the post.
These comments are hilarious, mostly due to the fact that most of the commenters have only proven that they didn't read the article because I clearly stated that the issue I had with Starcraft (which is not what the entire article is about) was that the game's auto-patch software refused to finish the patch due to "multiple issues with saving data".
I do apologise, next time I will not attempt to run the patching so...
Looks like HipHopGamer and that Nick dude from Lazygamer are having an argument over whos article came first. LOL
http://twitter.com/NickdeBr...
http://twitter.com/hiphopga...
Strange how there has been a story exactly like this on N4G all day already? Did you even come up with this yourself?
Like err, this one right here : http://www.n4g.com/News-478...
I'm the author. Now you have the two for one special.
Our sites comments are starting to build with people saying they are waiting for Bad Company 2. I think it's going to be great
it isn't actually two years behind, most games arrive at the same time, or at worst a few days after the US and Europe.
How do people not realise that this article is not against any console? It's actually AGAINST console wars, yet everyone seems to think that the author is somehow more attached to one gaming console. Seriously, how do people get themselves so worked up to the point that they are arguing over something that isn't even there.
I'm starting to wonder ho...
the same thing about you.
Err, Expy asks "where the hell is that" and I answer, and you ask me who cares. Do you people even read any of this stuff before replying, seriously?
Codemasters are at least handling the community pretty well with their response, it looks like they genuinely do want to sort it out.