Imo they want to move those units first then backend them bluefaces.
Doom or Doom Eternal?
Yeah the Bethesda purchase has the Sony fanboys hurting bad. They managed to get a completely random topic approved on this site because since Pachter randomly made up an idea about Sony buying WB it does not even have an official rumor behind it. So no rumors allowed but, borderline rumors as long as it presented as random analyst discussion.
Seems like a good list. Don't think I have heard of all of them. Do not have a super huge rpg history though as a gamer.
It is probably because lack of software optimization and the fact that you need about twice the raw power to run those games at twice the resolution and framerate.
He sounds like this guy named genxgamer or xbot destruction that trolls the comment sections at wccftech but, disregard if you don't know what/who I am talking about.
I mean we all know that would be worlds funner. Instant has pretty much always been funner in movies, games, life etc...
I am right there with you on that one. They held back maybe most of their AAA games though. And they should have shown way more gameplay. Halo also looked fun and smooth but, last gen graphics. But, for me also this show beat Sony easy.
Not sure what buying fortnite stock has to do with being impressed by the ue5 demo. Haha.
@Razzer
Yep. I agree with you as well. And I was not disagreeing with you. So you clearly saw my point and I clearly saw yours.
You can't know the experience through and through without playing but, you can absolutely guage if the game appeals to you enough to make a day one purchase(or at all) or not. And it does not matter if all the reviewers on metacritic say it is as long as it is or is not to you yourself.
H
This is all because people like you know no sony game even with the help of the spiderman brand can match the real best devs like Rockstar, bethesda, Bluemoon(Pubg), Ea(Battlefield),Nintendo, epic in first day sales or year on year sales. Sony is probably top 10 though. In a sells context.
Well I am sure you can see he is saying they did not allow it approval for a headline like they would have if it was a to bash someone like say EA. Instead they veiled it inside an article about the first gaming knowing full well that no one will go looking for that information in an article looking backward at an old game as in this case the first last of us game.
I don't know if you responded to me with vulgar language and got spammed but, I sent the PM. If you did then there is no excuse for not getting your point across with 3 messages and a pm. IF you did not then nevermind. I mean anyones proof. If not then disregard this message and this will be my last.
Yeah this is certainly is a Sony stronghold although the fanboying is all over the place from multiple camps.
Respond to my comment coward. And yeah that guy jpi did not need to say something like that. The comment i said about 1>3. And when you act like you don't know what i am talking about it is cuz you know you are a p#$$y.
I mean yeah cuz they are not bottom feeders and mill men. It is what it is.
Well a game isn't going to have as high an attach rate across multiple generation but, those people are only counting each singular generation and I am sure you and everyone else realise that. The last of us 2 has sold exceptionally well but, don't pretend it tops things like Grand theft auto, fallout, skyrim, halo in it's heyday, blizzard top games in history red dead redemption 2 and more etc.
Did it do great yes. Has it or any Sony game in history earned all ...
No, and they did not confirm any quick resume to all save locations either. They specifically said "some points". Until they show otherwise that means basic loading. Twice as fast as series x basics loading and and twice as slow as series x quick resume depending on game.