You can't shine a turd
1. Sony has never used a 3rd party App why would they ever?
2. XMB has won awards for its simplicty, don't fix what ain't broke.
3. In-game music is there it is up to the DEVELOPERS to use it or not.
4. PSN redesign is always happening, maybe not as fast as everyone wants but it has been evolving since the day it came online.
5. Cross Game Chat isn't a must it is an option. I could care less about it due to the fact the games I play online everyone...
And Xbox3/PS4 will leave the mobile gaming chips in the dust too. Comparing new tech to 5-10 year old tech your gonna see difference captain Obvious.
And it will only take a few weeks for them to show up again. what else does IW think they can do right?
Kind of funny that they want the hardcore games for move yet they do not mention Killzone3, MAG, and Heavy Rain. Just the 3 off the top of my head that you get 2 games for the price of 1. Yes you can play with the Move or you can play with a DS3. Either way they are hardcore games that have Move support.
newleaf/pog/GEC/troll
I suggest you actually open your eyes and try games for yourself instead of listening to the other internet trolls. You might actually like what your own eyes tell you instead of what other people try to preach about.
Infamous 2
Killzone 3
LittlebigPlanet2
Yakuza 4
Doesn't seem like a disappointing year to this Ps3 owner.
PS3 gamers have better games to be playing/looking forward too. Just because you port a game to the system doesn't mean it will sell. NMH2 wasn't good on the wii what makes people think it will do better on a system that has better games out and coming out?
I bet it will get the same support as F2010 did too. which is none.
You can in a way. They have remote racing where you can take up to 15 of your friends drivers and 1 of your own drivers and race like 5-6 different classes of cars on different tracks.
10 gigs of ram is for developers who don't know how to program properly. It is for the Crysis developers and the Metro 2033, the people who want great looking games and not having to build a decent engine.
The whole game is under-development still last I figured. I mean don't get me wrong I thoroughly enjoy it but to me PD/Kaz looked at the grand picture from the start instead of taking stepping stones and working from a common denominator.
No I am just saying that if developers would actually take time to make a game instead of trying to shovel a new version out the door every 6 months we would see a better quality of games released.
Probably doesn't even come close to what computers can do now a days due to the fact that people go overboard on Ram due to Developers NOT programing efficiently. It all comes down to how bad you want your game to look instead of how your game plays.
Crysis is a perfect example. The game looks great but if you look at the way it is coded then you understand why it is such a resource hog.
If you knew how to code properly you wouldn't need as much Memory there Epic.
If done right the style of AA shouldn't matter.
And the number of shoddy games being pumped out is severely hurting consumers? It's a lose/lose system right now.
Everyone should just push bethsada to learn to release a game that isn't a bugged out glitchfest. And then, and only then maybe would console makers take their wishes into consideration.
Sounds like someone is going about the routine of "the only bad publicity is no publicity."
Just like FM3 was the "Definitive Racer of this Gen?"