Well, if you want to be completely fair, games have changed a lot since I was a child. So I could argue that games themselves have become porn.
Hot coffee anyone?
There is already plenty of porn on the PC.
This is by FAR the funniest thing I have read in a long time. N4G needs more articles like this. Kudos to the writer. Classic!
Oh the hours of my life lost playing the original RB6 Vegas. Good times. I am not a big fan of the sequel though.
It looks like a grill. I want to grill some chicken on it.
This is great news. I am excited to play this game.
Lets be clear here. He is proclaiming that the screen itself is fake. He is not saying that PS2 downloads will never come to the PS3, that would be a foolish statement to make.
Well if you look at it that way I see your point. There was no need for people to disagree with you for simply stating that the image could be fake back then. But it seems that people who want to believe this is true will do so no matter what.
At what point did they say this? Because Patrick clearly told GamePro that the company had no plans to provide such a service.
http://www.gamepro.com/news...
Not sure I understand your point Sangria. Are you simply trying to blast the writer? He doesn't say that his experience in Photoshop was used at all, he simply says that he went into it looking for Photoshop evidence and found no glaring faults.
Quite convenient that you left out the next line in which he says...
"So with that in mind, any Photoshop detective work is pretty much thrown out the window."
Sure. Yah. And that usually happens when the actual description has yet to be thought up.
I am not going to continue to argue with you and attempt to shatter your hopes. You obviously want to believe it is real and there will be no convincing those with that mindset, so enjoy.
Bottom line is that the person got lazy and didn't think anyone would examine it that closely. Sony is not going to get the description wrong for one of their most recognizable titles. The faker screwed up and that is that.
I understand what you are saying, but the description is not even close. It is talking about a revamped version of the game (which is exactly what the Substance series is). Their is no reason to put that description underneath the original game.
Now I could understand if the description was a variation of the original description. For example, the box copy is slightly different from the copy that appears on Konami's site, and the summary given for the game on IGN is also slightly...
You are entitled to your opinion, but in my eyes that screen is fake.
I am not hating on the PS3 or Sony. I own both every console out there minus the Wii because I can't be bothered with jumping up and down just to play a videogame.
This person overlooked one detail and it came back to haunt him/her. That is that.
If only all sick twisted men agreed to abide by that rule...
In a gaming news world that is crammed with resolution debates and "will it or won't it come out on my console" garbage 99% of the time it is good to have a laugh once and a while at someone who takes the time to look at things a little differently than everyone else.
How many times can you stomach reading the same garbage written the same way over and over? Lighten up.
Pro-tip #2: Never watermark over any female parts that men may want to look at -- we already have enough censors for that kind of stuff.
Can we all agree to never watermark boobs?
Couldn't agree with you more George. How is it that a company does nothing for 10 years and then insults E3 calling it "irrelevant"???
Hello??? And what are you 3D Realms?????
Actually, if you practice with that controller long enough, you will have a line of girls outside your door that wraps around the block....and yes, you may have smelly fingers if you don't stop to bathe.