It's been updated since cod4 but not completely revamped. Just updated every year. Activision is milking that engine for all its worth. World at war was modified from cod4 engine and so on and so on.
the point is, the engine is from 2007. Therefore the game looks like its still from 2007, graphics and console engines have advanced a lot since 2007. It needs updated
googled that for you
http://lmgtfy.com/?q=Audrey...
This is actually the first n4g article I've commented on in quite some time. Like 90 days actually I just checked my history to see, so not sure what you're talkin about. I'm simply wondering where all the people are who were claiming the DLC was a scheme that they would charge for?
I just came on here to laugh at all the conspiracy theorists out there who when this was first announced claimed "IT WAS ALL PLANNED FROM THE BEGINNING, ea and bioware planned to have a "sucky" ending (btw a story is completely subjective as in one person might hate it and another like it) and they plan on everyone reacting badly enough so they could release ending dlc to charge for. Seriously I saw people claiming it as fact and calling people idiots if they didn't believe...
@exsturminator01
Yeah, and then if you read EXTRA hard it says 2014. Thats 2 years from now it expires when nobody cares anymore about mass effect 3
so why was the media spelling doom for the vita? if you look at the numbers they are right in line with the other systems
that's also a reason. trust me people love to hate on popular things. don't tell me they don't. I'm not saying there is only one reason you are right but it is one of them.
why all the disagrees? it says right in the title most anticipated of 2012 and this guy thinks hes funny with his sarcasm. I realize that its cool and popular in the gaming community to hate on COD these days because of how mainstream it has become but whatever i guess
guess you missed the point. They KNOW its obvious, but for every title they list the dev and release. Why would they just leave it blank in the article just because it's obvious, would be inconsistent
it's "most anticipated of 2012" not "possibly releasing in 2012"...nice attempt and being sarcastic though
what were they supposed to do? leave the release and dev blank because its COD so everyone knows? they list it for every game dont be such a jack a**
They have her mannerisms down correctly because of a little something called motion capture people. I'm 100 percent confident she is working with the team on the game.
sarcasm much?
I have read a few comments and haven't seen anybody say it so I will. the figures presented are not "nearly double" at all of ps3 sales. ps3 sales: 1,500,000. 360 sales: 2,250,000. If it were "nearly double" wouldn't you say 360 sales would have to be at least 2,700,000 range?
Well i think there is an obvious money theme in the logo so i do not think its idiodic
ummm. you are not very good with sarcasm are you? He obviously knows the V stands for five and is a roman numeral any moron knows that. He was being sarcastic because the whole article was about how he didn't like that it was "been there done that" with gta, he wanted something totally new. While i completely disagree with his article you need to work on picking up sarcasm lol
hmm
You should change your name to LOGICFAIL
the file name of the picture hosted on sony's server is "ps_gow-teaser." So looks like it's GOW
http://ps3.ign.com/articles...