I'm sure you don't even know that Shield is at minimum 40% more powerful cpu, and nearly over 400% more powerful graphics chip.
Of course, you wouldn't, otherwise you wouldn't be saying its not worth the extra 100$.
You mean pretty much no end game.
Added that currently the early area below 20 is flooded and everything between that and the "end" game is empty as hell and you can't find anyone to do the events.
I loved GW2, it was fun and looked fantastic, but that's it, lack of players really kills it.
Tera had the problem with End game being unplayable because of the engine limitations.
NeverWinter Beta has no end game...
And I can play GB/GBA/SNES/NES/N64/PS1/PSP and many other games on the Shield, plus soon to be gamecube and the possibility of ps2 games shortly.
As well as have 6 hours of game time verses the 3 and half on the vita, Not to mention upwards of 24 hours playback of hd video content before needing to be charged.
It supports HDMI out, as well as the OTG which I can plug one of my 1TB external drives into.
Really I have no reason to buy a Vita e...
They just look bad in general, Even older games like RUSH. The Daytona model looks fine and pretty much is on par, but these two just look like cartoon versions of the real car.
But its also limited by bandwidth.
Outside of large populated cities, or even in larger ones, many of the wifi connections in the US are 3mb connections down and 1mb up.
Some with high latency. which wouldn't even be remotely suited for something like this.
Great idea, but outside of Japan were wifi and connection is abundant, a large majority of the world needs to really catch up.
Not saying its not needed or a bad thing...
Outside of those horrible models, looks pretty good, and the quality of the textures is rather nice.
I personally have beef with GT5's tire model system, Wheels should not over heat and produce no traction for that period of time, nor continue to smoke for no reason.
My grip with Forza is mostly brake fading which doesn't seem to exist at all.
Please don't bring up Tourist trophy, that game took very little resources, It used everything from GT 4 except had new models created.
All of the tracks/Physics and menu's were even ripped straight from GT4. that required very little production value.
GT-HD had been started shortly after finishing 4, And all it did was use the same physics engine from GT 4 and put better graphics on it.
I'm surprsied you don't know this if yo...
Like what sort of Distractions? They only make 1 game brand consistently. They have over 140 members on the team. GT HD/P were released 4 years prior to 5, GT 4 was released 2 years before those with GT3 2 years before that.
And GT PSP was just a modified GT4 with far less content.
There isn't anything to distract them, Instead they are wasting time on things many of the fans do not care about. And would rather see other problems fixed on release. Not pat...
Both games are a lot of fun, and enjoyable. But this "king of simulator" stuff is a joke when you have to compete with the high end PC simulators out there similar to iRacing, rFactor2, o RaceRoom.
I mean yea its all fun for you guys to argue over which is better. but in the end those games have far to many flaws to be considered remotely sims.
I'm sorry but I won't. At least not yet. Project shield has my ears mainly because I can use OTG to plug my 1TB external drive in, I can play ps1/N64 and older games on it, and possibly PS2/Gamecub games in the next few months.
And since it uses the much cheaper MicroSD card for external storage I'm even more sold, plus its extended battery life I can play games for a longer period and watch movies for a even longer one. Added that rooting and kernel modifications ha...
Its called selling in stock/bulk.
They sell it at a lower price because they buy so many of them.
I'm going to say the APU in both of these systems will be around the same performance from a FX-4100, or just above a 955BE.
More power than any casual PC user really ever needs.
I'm not giving you a disagree because of your bash on consoles.
Personally I enjoy these new generations, it doesn't matter the side, loads of great games are to come.
But this idea that intel > AMD is just stupid, as both CPU/GPU compete well in the price ranges, Many times only a difference of 1-2fps. And very small amounts of difference performance wise.
Usually negligible.
The problem is they wouldn't, As soon as they said free to play, the large majority of players. Those being end game and PVP players would all quit out.
What would be the point of playing a MMO when the end game can just be purchased and the PVP gear can be bought to compete with the top tier items.
Its exactly why other MMO's don't get a following, people don't like it when instead of having to work for a item you can simply buy it.
I never said they shouldn't try, I'm saying don't expect much.
Heck they tried to put out a second HAWK and it came out even worse.
I hope its that Monster Hunter online is getting a western release.
Oh god how I hope it is.
Wait you just said starcraft?
A game that was released in 1998 and had its sequel in 2010?
I'm sorry but that is nothing like a sports game that only changes a roster and a few plays.
You mean how they tried to beat out Ace combat with the HAWK series and failed miserably?
Odd, I'd give that to a Race wheel.
No, you seem to be the one not understanding.
currently there are 8 Billion subscribers to WoW, Many of those subs are people who are end game or end PVP. You remove the subscription fee and add in even basic items like mounts and costums for profit, no one will buy them. Its pointless to those people.
If you try and pull people into the end game of PVE or PVP with purchased items then you will lose the core group. once that happens you start to lose players....