Are all bad? In free to play games NO, in 60 bucks game YES, if we absolutely have to have them at least make them cosmetic only
Bullshit, i really hope not!
Some people want always to create controversy, this is medieval eastern europe we are talking about, of couse most people where caucasian, 99% of them probably, this doesn't mean this game is racist, not at all, it's just historical accurate, if it was set in zambia and all people were white then yes, maybe it would have been racist
I Feel bad for them too, some of them seems to have never played a story driven single player game, sad.
Get a used OG Ps4 at 150 bucks, problem solved.
Unholy alliance! i really hope this is not true
All i know is that i loved that game and i would really like a sequel, the sequel could have been the studio chance for redemption in the eyes of the comunity! Ready at Dawn deserves better!
Witcher 3 and Skyrim (single player only games) gave me easily 100+ hours of game content, enjoy lag and not being able to enjoy your game when the servers are offline
enjoy getting your ass kicked by a 12 years old korean and spending money on loot boxes
Don't even try to create an unexistent controversy, the game looks bloody great!
I was, i am and i always will a single player only gamer! long live disc based single player games!
I still believe we are getting a ps5 in fall 2019, the ps4 and xbox one were not technically impressive in 2013 so i don't see them last 7-8 years, also i have serious doubts that those mid gen upgrades are very succesful, most people play in base hardware, also ps3 lasted 7 years because of the recession, so fall 2019 also to kill microsoft momentum with xbox one x being the superior (only hardware wise) console.
I think he is exaggerating, horizon zero dawn (also a single player only title) was way more ambitious than quantum break but nevertheless was a smashing success
do you realize that the ps4 came out in 2013? in 2020 will be 7 years old, perfectly normal for sony to release a ps5 by then
I Don't care about 4k but i would love 1080 60 fps in all games on consoles
I stil don't get why games nowadays are more expensive to make than 5 years ago, why? because they have to use an improved resolution and better textures? or because they have to give every npc a job? give me a break, details are nice but don't destroy your budget in silly things, also they spend too much on marketing
Shut up Pachter! You know nothing John Pachter....
Screw all online only games, long live single player games!
Again with this bullshit, corporate apologists unite, even if they raise the prices they will continue to ask more and more and more, greed never stops, the only thing you are going to get are 80 dollars game fill with loot boxes and microtransactions
Want to know who used to hide nudity from statues? Mussolini and the fascist regime in Italy, how low has ubisoft fallen....