Doesn't even look like the same experience visually. Not just lower resolution, lower frame rate, washed color but there is missing environmental objects and missing textures and low image contrast. OMFG I did not expect the major difference.
Like I said developers fear the fanatical blowback from wild fanboy faction in the Sony camp, the scores should have been different. Jesus some of the brighter and darker portions of the game suggest the PS3 version is comparable to ...
Move is a Wiimote clone. Move has nothing on Natal. Both Wii and Move will be over looked at the revolution the world calls Natal.
Natal> Wiimote> Move for sure. This is the reason all Japanese developers and the other 99% of developers support Natal. This is why Natal won E3 2009 and the reason Natal won E3 from the consumer polls taken. Natal is so big it will have it's own show at 2010 E3 plus the standard 360 showing. Natal has the world excited and parties outs...
Nah it's obvious they started planning much earlier than FF13 when the company decided to try and tackle the western market hence the complete secrecy. SE heavy hitters started planning/development on PS3 way before SE announced and decided to give equal treatment to the west and western platforms. This is why fanboys assume these games are exclusive when SE was going multi platform slowly for years. Probably started planning before they started planning/work on FF13. If FF versus is a ac...
This article is damage control. They're testing the waters trying to get fanboys use to the idea.
New update is now up. Issue fixed.
I'm going to believe the guy that has seen both games running on hardware. Thank you for your baseless opinion though.
Normally PS3 has better lighting? LOl You mean you like the low contrast faded look of PS3 hardware better.
Not even videogamezone can hide the differences this time.
I see uncharted 3 pic but uncharted 2 came out about a half a year ago lol. If Sony announces sequels to any game that came out at the end of 2008 or in 2009 it will be a sign of desperation due to the 360's E3.
Washed out
Struggling Frame Rate
The >Rage< devs are doing the same thing RockStar did with RDR. Id is showing off RAGE on the 360 allowing the 360 version to be previewed and in a damage control effort is claiming the PS3 version is more stable yet mostly showing off the 360 version.
Crysis 2 devs are hyping up the 360 version of Crysis 2 now, following suit.
Read what is going on in my Comment #1.9
EDIT
The 360 is simply the more capable console. If you take the time to do the research or pay attention the 360 excels at more complex games with advanced gameplay that require more processing[hybrids, open world, non linear]. PS3 excels at linear games not because the PS3 is more powerful but because Sony and devs choose these type of games to showcase the PS3 easier providing a shortcut. Games like Halo Reach, Lost planet 2, RAGE, RDR will show this.
Never will. Move won't come close. People will buy the 360 as if it was a new console because of Natal. Natal will have its own market all by itself. Move will be seen as a Wii copycat.
#1
SUD HD.
That's fake. That is damage control based from a upscaled screenshot. That is why that story FAILED!!!!!!!!!!!!
It's just the way it is, each console has it's advantages. PS3 can produce stunning linear games or at least Sony has devs that know how to push the PS3 better than people on the 360 side pushing the 360. The 360 is good at more complex games with dynamic gameplay and design. This is why the 360 excels with games like Halo Reach and Lost Planet 2.
Rage is a nother game you have to watch out for because the developers are doing the same thing with that game showing o...
In the twilight zone.
When I read comments coming from the Sony camp I can't help but to think
http://www.newline.com/prop...
http://uk.ps3.ign.com/artic...
This is the US review on IGN UK. Look by the date of the review in my link(first page of the review I) Both IGNs use the US IGN PS3 review.
Please don't post the 360 IGN review(s) either.
IGN UK 360
http://uk.xbox360.ign.com/a...
...
What makes you say that, because of the free content? I hope you're not talking about IGN UK and IGN US both reviewing the 360 version while both IGN UK and IGN US used the same PS3 review. Yes this it true IGN UK used the IGN US PS3 review. This is why things where not adding up when it came to scores in the different categories.
IGN 360: 9.8
http://uk.xbox360.ign.com/a...
http://n4g.com/news/525948/...
Stop with the damage control the tweet doesn't say anything that suggests it's a reconfirmation of PS3 exclusivity.