For free? Okay? How does that invalidate what I said? Don't even know why I got disagrees lol. This site has some weird-ass inhabitants.
Even though this and tons of other remasters have come out on PC as well. Nice try thougj
Raven did a great job for sure, but these comparisons also remind you of just how good the original game looked and still looks as well.
That response was fucking brilliant, lol.
Kevin Butler was one of the greatest ad characters ever made. They should've put him in PlayStation All-Stars, lol. Was a huge shame when they canned it all because of the Wii commercial.
It's 2016 and now people get labeled as sheep for not mindlessly going out and buying a game without researching to see if it's a technical and/or ideological disaster first?
Wow.
"You don't release a shitty product and expect the next thing to sell."
Actually that totally sums up the past two gaming generations in general. Only a deluded fool would argue otherwise. Seen WAY too many shitty games masquerading as good ones under the sheen of "ooh look! it's a AAA budget game!" and lofty promises. Too many games releasing in broken states of varying degrees, and games that were just wholly uninspired in every shape and form....
Pretty sure they do qualify as a AAA studio seeing as how they are developing games with AAA budgets which rake in AAA profits (protip: "A" "AA" and "AAA" have nothing to do with quality, they simply are a reference to the relative size of the budget of a project.)
I never understand when 'classic RE' diehards always throw out stuff like "limited ammo" and "herbs" when talking about why the series needs to devolve a...
Rez's unique visual style doesn't need to be ridiculously revamped. The game looks good already.
Didn't even know this game was a thing. Literally never heard about it until now :/
Nice job demonstrating your immense ignorance here lol
Well of course there will be. They sell like gangbusters every year, so why not?
16 maps in the base game of MW1, and then the DLC pack added 4 more.
Lol he probably voices like half the characters in the game or something
Pretty sure this is a re-post. I literally commented on one of these submissions a little over a week ago.
This. The hardware wasn't the Vita's problem, it was Sony unceremoniously abandoning the damn thing not long after they released it.
A great campaign? So they played the full, complete game already?
The confusion is the fault of the users on the web too stupid to do any research or use critical thinking skills, as well as terribad "journalists" who have no idea what it means to be concise and accurate with their reporting.
It's simple:
1) Devs have to use money for the patches because it requires manpower and time to create them (manpower + time = money), as well as potential DEV charges for hosting the patches (this has been a thing f...
The Ryders are the Hype Family. They don't GET hyped, they STAY hyped!!!
Wow man, did you have an aneurysm after hitting the "submit" button?
It baffles me as to why people feel so emotionally/mentally inclined to care SO MUCH about something as trivial as a review score. It's literally just... a number... You don't need to defend a game this hard lol.