Good start but there is soooo much more that needs to be fixed. Like the kill distance on commando pro needs to be shortened and make it to where they dont lunge forward faster then is humanly possible. Also make m203 rounds and grenades have the same kind of power, I get angry how semtex and grenades can kill people within a range of 15 feet but m203 rounds have to be within a couple of feet to be effective.. I've even had grenades explode on a players body and it didnt kill them yet one...
Actually the fact that you have to have a controller in conjunction with kinect makes kinect a fail. No hardcore no bueno...
I'm sorry but this is exactly why I dont like microsoft, they hype the living snot out of something as new and progressive until the community starts to realize that the product is flawed and lacking. So they quickly create some damage control and its obvious that they are doing so. Sadly the 360 faithful will not only eat up all of it but they have become the spokesmen for microsoft and try to convince the rest of the gaming world that it's an honest statement. I'm sick of micros...
Sony continues making the highest quality products that money can buy but thats the problem. Alot of people can't justify those prices with the economic climate the way it is right now.. Sony still is a leader in videogames seeing as they push more advancements into our medium then anyone else but their sales haven't reflected this fact because of a multitude of reasons that they are addressing and in doing so have gained considerable ground as far as sales go.. They are making great ...
Why are you happy about a company losing profits? Especially one like sony which has done more for this industry then anyone else? You and the people who think like you are going to kill this industy with that kind of logic.. Please stop.
Well the article did say that it only tabulated brand value in the fiscal year of 2010.. But nonetheless they are quantifying a percieved value and you really cannot do that because value is highly subjective.. Just because the ps3 brand is estimated to have less valuation then the wii and 360 holds no bearing over the quality and sales of the console.. Sony has an all inclusive console meaning they only make money off of console sales and content sales. They dont have revenue drivers like li...
I see where you are going but with the continued optimization of the blu-ray tech and the mass adoption prices of the materials involved have dropped off sharply. This translates to cheaper movies at least, and the entirety of this generation ps3 games have been exactly the same as the 360 dvd 9 games. So it's apparent that blu-ray as a technology adds nothing in the way of end user cost for the content itself.. Thats refreshing and one of the ways that sony is succesful with their produc...
Sony and nintendo both dabbled in the 3dv tech, which is what powers kinect, and deemed it as limited tech and turned it down. Sony and nintendo both then began researching their own methods of motion technology and nintendo realized that in order to keep costs down and maintain healthy interest they needed a simplistic approach and it has worked wonders for them.. Sony has been developing their method since the intial concept of the eyetoy which helped to fund the ps eye which in turn evolve...
Sony nor anyone else has proclaimed sony to be the first. Sony is the first to really get behind the tech and drive it forward but the author of this article can't seem to get past the fact that the name sony is behind it. It's just a warning sign that he's biased and I thoroughly ripped his rant apart in the comment section.. Him, and the myriad of other journalists that proliferate the internet are giving this industry a bad name for their poorly written articles..
I fully agree in those opinions about ps3 having the best exclusives, hardware, and online but they are just opinions... Sony makes money off the ps3 brand as a whole, alot of money. Do they make more then microsoft and the 360? I have no clue but why should that matter. If sony is making profit and their shareholders continue to be satisfied then I honestly see no problems. Your attempt at quantifying value has nothing to do with the ps3 and its millions of users around the world. Profits ar...
You're on dangerous ground.. I applaud your willingness to entertain their ideas but this article was poor.. Bad grammar, incomplete statements, lots of opinions and so on.. Most of what they tried to pass off as fact was really alot of partial truths. For example they state "To put this into perspective, a standard Wii remote is $40, nunchuck is $20, and a motion plus is $20 making the entire controller cost $80 and the Kinect which can detect up to 6 players cost only a sin...
Guys elicymet is just stating they dont build on SOME of their IP's which is honestly true.. Little big planet and heavy rain are perfect examples of sony at their best. Sony lets some IP's drift into obscurity for various unknown reason but it does happen. Resistance is a good example, resistance 1 was fantastic. 2 however was a letdown for alot of people, they moved away from what made the first one so engaging. I liked 2 alot but not as much as the first and I think this is what el...
Agreed. I fully share what you all have stated. Go back to the article, even though it means giving them another hit, and scroll down to the comments section.. I totally ripped this article apart. Some of my best writing, I would like to have you all read it and give me some feedback please!!
BTW Bubbles for all.
Take note people this is a good example of a subjective opinion.. Bubbles are in order.
You may or may not be right, thats subjective but, this game was designed for move. This is why it works for move, Also I really don't think this is targeted to everyone. It doesn't look interesting to you? Cool I can respect that but, that doesn't dimish the fact that alot of people do. I'm looking forward to it because it has some interesting mechanics like the spell casting and the shape shifting potions.. I mean isn't that we try new games, new experiences right? This ...
Yes there are some games that CAN utilize two move controllers but, there's only one or two that I can recall which require 2.. But nonetheless, with move sony utilizes options. While you can easily get into the move universe without a large investment you can just as easily expand move to fully take advantage of it.. This is, in my opinion, the beauty of move. For your skeptical fence rider that isn't convinced by move they can essentially get "MOVING", excuse the pun, for ...
Anything made under the pixel junk brand is a guarantee, fat princess, pain, braid, trine(my personal favorite)....
No alot of people don't generally buy alot of stuff off of psn because of the "unknown" factor. They have no knowledge of a game and there isn't much in the way of screen shots or advertisements that allow the consumer to feel comfortable with their purchase.. They fear that they will waste their money so they ultimately decide to not buy.. Yes there are demos for alot of games but thats not enough. This sux bc there are alot of excellent games on psn; anything in the pixel ...
Read my above statement to see the error in your comment..
My only gripe with this article is the fact that he's implying that kinect has more value built in then move. I don't agree with that, yes kinect would be cheaper if you purchased everything you needed to fully take advantage of move but move is more practical and precise in regards to the experience that it delivers. So because kinect is cheaper doesn't automatically make it a better value. It has to have software before that claim holds any water and so far there hasn't been...