actually it has less to live up too since it cant be as shitty as the last one
EA is not a big bad company shitting out games. This game was made by a hard working dev team trying to make it the best they can. Dont reduce their work to "EA half-assing" thats idiotic
this isnt normal dlc they will just be adding in fighters they couldnt finish. They worded it like it'll be free but who knows
Its neither really. They said Because they put so much work into each fighter and only had 2 years they just werent able to do more in time, and they will be released as dlc. Thats perfectly reasonable. But if the dlc is paid, then thats greedy as all hell.
Not only is it sizable its freakin huge. I think a cool touch is not giving the player a world map. Makes the exploration fun and mysterious.
and its not halo exactly but if feels distinctly Bungie, like the game they've always wanted to make.
Dude if the beta is only a snippet of the game i cant image how huge and expansive and filled with content this game will be. So fun, so much weapons and armor, its just sick.
its just so watered down and feels purposeless. 1080p/60fps? the graphics are awful and the loading screen buildings look like cardboard cutouts. Not only is it an expansion, its a shitty one at that.
after playing destiny the BF harldine beta is so beyond bad. Seems much worse than BF4 to me.
of course it borrows ideas from other entertainment mediums and games. everything does. but to say its a clone or copying those things is silly, especially ones made after it. that is just ass-backwards
Just please stop with the titanfall/elysium idiotic comparisons. the game was in development before either of those and the devs know people are being idiots about it.
I think this game is going to be incredible. It has the addictive loot of borderlands, super clean shooting, beautiful graphics, and awesome planets and exploration.
Yesterday i did a strike with two random guys it took us almost an hour to beat it and we silently worked together like an actual team. It was Intense!
Yes Exactly! you have a bunch of children yelling about a game like watch dogs, saying it sucks, and they have never played it! they somehow think other people's opinions can substitute for theirs.
I think Reviews are a good starting point. If your on the fence and a games has a 40 on metacritic that can be quite helpful. Games are expensive so you want to make an informed decision.
when did you sign up?
Give me a break these journalists are like tabloids at this point.
and the percentage of successful lobbed through balls in real life is much much much less than in fifa. It is overpowered in the game
It shouldn't be about catch-up. Firstly, CB's dont stand to the side of an attacker like in fifa, they actually position themselves to tackle. They make sure they give the attacker space incase he recieves the ball and turns. They stay in front him while he's sprinting to avoid getting beat. Rarely, does an attacker simply sprint past a defender whose running towards his own net. It takes a perfect pass or skill move for that to happen in real life
No NO NO the game does not need to be faster paced or more like fifa 13 that game was awful. slow it down or fix the passing, there are too many break a ways behind the defense and too many lobbed through balls.
Far Cry 3 and Tomb Raider were the biggest surprises last year, such amazing games