Obvious statement is obvious
I'm wondering if they'll make a sequel to SO. They wanted to keep the IP and that's why it was an Xbox Exclusive, but I'm wondering was it worth it in the end if they don't do anything with the IP.
I have many I could list but just give me Socom 2 Remastered and I'll be fine.
It was GT but wasn't awful to me. The traditional fighting style was done before in the name of Dragonball. That's my point, people are acting like this is the first time.
However, this is the first time for it to be a big deal. Especially with the Guilty Gear engine behind it, if that's true.
Yeah I don't understand the negativity. The game looks great to me. Love how the weather affects the gameplay too.
Bout*
Don't care what the reason is, Wolverine is one of my main characters. If the X-men isn't in it, no buy from me.
Exclusives is what sets consoles apart.
Can I get Bloodborne, Ratchet and Clank, Horizon Zero Dawn, Persona, NeiR, NiOh, Infamous, Uncharted, The Last of Us, Yakuza, Until Dawn, Spiderman, God of War, Days Gone, or Detroit on Xbox?
No? Then I'll get the console that I can and play multiplat too. Sony is smart in that they have exclusives in almost every genre. So that person looking for which console to play on knows there is a game in a genre that ap...
"This is the DBZ game people always wanted"
I must be the only one who remembers Dragon Ball Z: Final Bought on PS1.
Anyway, the game simply looks better than infinite. I don't like the art style they started using since MvC3. It also feels way slower than MvC2. It's strange because they had a perfect formula but messed with it too much.
DBZ Fighter is like MvC2 + Guilty Gear + DBZ Characters. Can't lose with that....
People seriously think the more expensive model is going to sell when the 1s isn't selling well in comparison? Can't be serious. The 1s will be the main model that sells.
I hope so or it'll be a big negative for me.
People forget that when making MGSV he was also building an engine. The development time was longer than usual. This time he started with an engine so it should reduce the development time.
Shawn played some of it, and Mark Cerny seen gameplay. Seems to be moving along.
Easy saying that when you're in a place with great internet. Always online is a nightmare for others.
In there pre-show yes
Hidden Agenda looks very interesting. My only question is, do we have to be in the same place to use this? Like can me and my friends who live in different places connect and play?
If not, they should try to incorporate that.
Great interview. This guy knows what he's talking about and the feeling they give off when discussing WW studios is lovely. They really create an atmosphere for creators to make what they want. I am however, starting to see that they value PSX more than E3.
I'm going to go to PSX this year as I feel they going to reveal a lot there.
This is why you supposed to have 1st party devs to showcase what your machine can do.
They're not going to do it because the truth is they feel it gives less reason to buy their system. If you have friends on the other side you could just play with them, but without cross play you have to get that system.
I'm pretty sure this isn't as big of a deal as people are making it seem. It's just something "journalist" can write about and fanboys can complain about.
Well gamers made him out to be a savior. You all forgot he was the head of MS studios prior to being the head of Xbox. He didn't have a great track record there either. Now people are mad saying he's not investing in 1st parties or as the apologist say "he hasn't had enough time". He was running MS Studios he wasn't investing then so stop thinking it'll be different now, and he had more than enough time.
People act like he was an outside hirer ...
Funny the article under this is "Crash Bandicoot N. Sane collection reminds us why we shouldn't remaster old classics".
Game sold out -__-