I'll assume you bought a vita to play great games. Where they come from makes no difference to me. I'd play mines more if i could get a bigger memory card (still a little upset i missed when AT&T had the 32GB on sale for $50).
@jet
You never go full retard, lol
whats a memory slut? lol
Sneak attack linked with kotor in FF7
If they launch at 299 then i doubt the 360 will match the ps4's specs ( i'm assuming the ps4 will launch around 400/450).
I hate that subsidised package, i for one would rather pay up front full cost for a console rather than get hit with hidden fees while i have it (I'd rather have my phone subsidised for some reason though).
IMO no way does sony launch at a higher price than MS this time. Whatever MS announces their price to be Sony will match that. Also i'd rather a console have one sku with all the same things. I hated the dual sku model they had this gen
Ps3 seems to have plenty of support to me, or are you seeing something different than i am?
blizzard games have been on consoles before.....
valve and sony should have just made a patnership for the upcoming gen. Their goals seems to be somewhat on the same path.
New generations dont follow that rule. Its always the best time for a company to steal away some consumers from a differnt company. I know at least 3 friends (in the real world) that are switching to PS next gen. They probably wont ever buy a PS3 but will switch because of a couple different factors, including free online, games, and some of my influence, lol.
ltttlebiplanet, god of war, ni no kuni, sly cooper, ratchet & clank, resistance, starhawk, twisted metal and motorstorm, equivalents? MS has a few good exclusives but sony has alot. I usually go with the system that satisfies my taste for a wide genre of games.
P.S. Yes all the games i named are games that i have in my collection.
Edit: How can people disagree with this? I asked a question and stated 2 personal facts.
its their game so they are still responsible for everthing that comes with it. They chose the outsource company, they chose not to put pearlescent items in the game at launch, they chose to make the game hard to add a level cap increase to (in their words).
From now on i might just wait for GOTY editions of gearbox games, they arent making a strong case for me to buy their games at launch after this.
i wasnt saying ninty was a bad company (for anyone that disagreed with me) i'm just saying ninty isnt some magical company that can put out new ideas at the drop of a hat. They create their fair share of new products but they also take already existing ideas and refine them and make them better.
i just dont like it when people act like nintendo thought up every single gaming idea ever and everybody else copies them.
Should have been available from the start. Gearbox effed up so hard with BL2 post launch content.
are you saying its not in the vita section or not on the store? I believe i have all the spyro games sitting on my ps3 right now. I'm in the US by the way
Outfoxies anyone? Nintendo didnt invent the genre like some people claim. Nintendo copied then innovated just like other good companies do.
how old are you? It might be a generational gap. duck tales was a very popular cartoon back in the day and lots of people watched it. From my understanding this was a really good game.
where have you been the last 3 years? Support from MS is almost gone for (i dont count kinect as support) outside the the usual gears, halo, forza title.
ahhh, my mistake then.
@qwark
1. Did the original xbox have many game that catered to the Japanese?
2. RROD had a ton to do with the 360's failure in japan. Why would they buy a system with a estimated 50% failure rate (at that time) by some places, as well as numerous other issues.
3. Just because a system has jrpg's doesnt mean their system is appealing, or are you saying that all they play is Jrpg's?