10 mins to download but been trying to get in for over half hour. Just an error message!
@r21 yeah I prefer having physical software 2 but I wouldn't pay extra for it.
@spenok yeah I understand that with games like cod but with playstation exclusives I don't feel we should have to pay twice. The bundle is a good idea tho.
To be honest I was thinking if you buy a game that is made for vita you should get a code to download it on ps3 for free. My reason behind this is because if its made on the vita we shouldn't have to pay extra for a ported game!
I know I'm gonna get disagrees for saying it but its just my opinion.
I wasn't bragging I was trying to get a point across. 3d is brilliant tech and I fully support it but I think active shutter tech is gonna be the dominant tech for the next 5 years at least!
You say that but look at how many people complained about illness from the 3ds, I have a 3ds and a 3dtv and in my opinion i'd much rather use the active shutter tech. you get a lot more depth, no problems with viewing angles, and its HD3d. I currently have the Samsung le40c750 and whilst its 3d its an early model and there is problems with crosstalk. I'm saving to buy a gt30 with this game because all though I've dealt with the problems of 3d I believe that the tech is that good ...
For me its not about a need for new graphics, more a curiosity and excitement to experience more advanced technology and more atmosphere in games.
(POSSIBLE SPOILER) The only thing I think was missing was indoor gameplay.
I would of if it was 3rd person. I member the first time I made duke have a piss, I remember how advanced it seemed. It was awesome.
I think Sony may have started development but not that long ago, and when they optimize the cell its gonna make the tech in the Wii u seem ancient. I also feel if the Wii u is more powerful then they should of shown something that had the wow factor. By showing demos that this gen can easy produce I really don't believe it will grab "core" gamers the way they are hoping.
Didn't some one say it started production 2 years ago, or that its running on 2 year old tech or something? Pretty sure I read that. Which means on release its already 2 year old tech.
Lol he's a pc gamer. ;P
But now they will be a gen behind come next gen and will have the.same lack of dev support as they do now.
I think they've made a wrong move, they should have mated out the tech sold at a loss then when next gen hit the console would be cheap and maxed sales.
Maybe more open and not as linear as ff13
Advice worked a treat, threw in u2, my ps got a little 2 excited and released a short range EMP at my xbox causing rrod.
Well an ipad/iphone costs the same amount but I bet the journalist or some of the people been negative own one.
If you keep waiting for cheaper/better tech you'd never buy anything.
Ok cheers that's cleared a lot up but then my question is, is it right of them to (based on rumoured specs) possibly charge an extra hundred dollars for the radio and more powerful battery?
And are we then going to have to top up 10 quid a month to use the feature we paid extra for?
Nope phones for a fiver on pay as you go no contract. There not very good but I said that to make the point that technology to implement a sim is not very expensive.
Also would 3g be fast enough to play games like killzone online? I hope so. And I also hope it has full support for remote play so we can play uc3 online at work.
Dude its all sorted ( for now) been playing for hours in 3d with no lag, framerate, connection or matchmaking issues.