i am actually being honest but you seem to have some inside info about the going ons in ms about " killers games and price drops" what makes you think sony wont match them / surpass them. you know sony does not even need to do anything ms is doing all the leg work for sony.
Edit:your name means nothing to me,your post is what matters. you made a comment i wanted to you to back up your post, its called a discussion
edit 2: dont change your comment no...
sony doesnt need to learn from ms. but ms needs to learn alot i mean alot from sony
why is that then microsoft uses the words " we want to support our consumers" i picture the devil saying sign your soul away there are more benefits on the dark side
andi like supporting your company
@ von it was mattrick see the below video that proves it
http://www.gametrailers.com...
more like slam dunk it on his smug face. " if you haven't got internet connection we've got a product for you its called xbox 360"
lol at the disagrees blinded xbox fansboys you can disagree from now till the xbox two. sony has already won this generation the big wigs dont care about giving you what you want, and if your wants dont directly match theirs they say " weve got a product for you its called the xbox 360" he don mattrick said that so dont be mad at me
if ms does not care about the consumer who are meant to purchase thier console do the dev really think ms cares about them or the money they will make or ms
MS to devs: we will get your games to the uk and american markets. poland is that near island or something???
surprise surprise microsoft is involved.
why would i want to pay for a device i dont need nor want
why would i pay for a device that needs the camera add on to work
why would i pay for a device i cannot control
value is key in this argument over what ms offered. ms offered nothing of value for the xbox live service while sony offers alot of value like games, online cloud saves etc. sony wants to invest in a more robust online service and those things cost alot of money to manage so passing the cost while also adding value to the service for customer is not a bad thing
god i sound like i work for sony's pr for ps plus service
i am currently a psplus subscriber before i did get one 2 years ago i was against it, but after seeing what value i got by subscribing i have never looked back. i mean if i was able to afford the xbox live without getting nothing back i mean the ps plus becomes a no brainer
back my question is why. i mean 17,000 to 989 just let it die like the kin and kin mobile that ms said was going to revolutionise the mobile world.
edit wait a minute that is the same catchphrase they used with the one revolutionise the gaming world
what you mean nothing about cod is a new experience
did you get amazing fish AI in the any of the previous cod
or jaw dropping dogs
yeah i didn't think so try harder buddy :)
that was actually funny
it amazes me how quick people are willing to give up thier consumer rights just to play some games they have only seen demoed. have none of them learnt anything from the aliens fiasco
high five
i wouldnt mind buying digital if they didnt cost the same or even more than the physical disk. but yeah you cannot force people to adopt a new tech when they haven't all got the infrastructure that allows the change to be a easy transition
everything microsoft does is always dirty business. they have no shame and when they are caught out they try and push the blame on someone else. the last microsoft item i will own is my laptop and 360 no more will i be consumer of any of thier products
i mean if everyone. from gamers to publishers and media outlet saying sony won e3 there must be some truth to it. the only people who think otherwise are microsoft themselves and like 12 of thier fans who keep buying and canceling thier preorders so the numbers go up