For AMD's sake.
GraczWatch
I see. I imagine they did that because they knew people might reject having to pay two subscriptions for one game.
It sounds like they only get a choice if it's a F2P title. Honestly, if a F2P game were to require a subscription then that's just bullocks.
What do publishers get out of putting their game behind PS+ anyway?
Riderz1337
Defensive?
I said "puslishers," and I was referring to the aggressive YouTube flagging.
Try again.
Seems like a good way for publishers with s**t games to sucker a few extra customers.
Who gives a flip what kind of "feel" it had? It was a successor that no one bought, so making another one likely isn't a plan.
?
Starhawk WAS Warhawk, and it flopped. You're probably not getting Warhawk 2.
Or a better story.
$9,749
Didn't Starhawk tank? Doubt another will be made anytime soon. Also, I'm pretty sure if for whatever reason another SOCOM comes out, it won't be anything like what you're hoping.
Lol, at the people in here. "Why isn't there "some" in the title!?!?! This is BS!!"
Don't think it matter'd that much. This will only be a problem for the people that read only the headline and troll the comments. Who cares about them anyway...
I wonder how large the performance gaps between the platforms will be in 3 years.
There will be if they keep this up their BS...
Google has been doing everything in their power to drive people away from YouTube lately.
*Has never seen the inside of an arcade*
So basically, they technically made an MMO but don't want to lose dollars from the people who say, "ew, MMO."
JackBNimble
Define "high end." If you're talking Nvidia's newest and baddest, that's about $700.
You can actually get a OS for about 90usd.
"specific services"
Like what?
I suppose I could only take your word for it.
Hmmm... I've got this weird feeling there are a lot of Gran Turismo fans in here...
Reminds me of 3D Dot Game Heroes.