If it isn't, then the actual PC version ought to face-melting.
The gif I saw looked pretty "finished." That doesn't really explain anything, whatever you were trying to explain.
Aren't prices higher in Asia anyways? The PS4 is supposedly 600 USD in Singapore.
There was hardly any science in this game; not any more than other apocalypse games.
Doesn't look as good as that gif I saw.
He brought it up for 10 seconds in his review and people decided to make articles about it. The fact that it was an exclusive made it worse.
It wasn't a "fiasco," it was a bunch of internet people blowing things out of proportion.
It's not a dilemma; wait until the last day.
There are video games that aren't animated?
I must be missing something. The pool of water is cool, but the textures on the stones look weaksauce.
And almost nothing for 2013. Glad I'm waiting til next year for something I'll want to play.
Probably what it'll actually end up looking like.
http://www.eurogamer.net/ar...
Read my second comment.
I'd like a good summary of this. Don't think I'll watch the whole thing.
I enjoyed the difficulty, I just never found time for it seeing as every time I died it made me replay a large segment of the game.
Never actually finished the first one. Maybe I'll give this one a shot. Got tired of the repetition.
This graphic is stupid. It's basing this only from Google searches and forum complaints? There are probably a ton of people that get pissed but just don't hop on an internet forum; or better yet, they just stop playing the game.
They're giving people even less reason to move to next gen consoles if they keep releasing games for last gen.
There has to be compromise. You are unlikely to have stellar graphical effects, high resolutions, AND high frame rates. In fact, 9/10 times, you only get two of those three things unless you have some serious hardware.
I don't think it matters either way if you can't afford it.