it's a pretty hard sell at £50 for a two year old port (that was maybe a bit overpriced to begin with)
Lots of remakes these days but this is one that really makes sense considering it's been stuck on PC this whole time and was a *rough* diamond.
Devs/pubs say this every single time when something is clearly inspired by/commentating on something controversial. Must be a legal thing.
I'm actually surprised by this, I feel like it came and went very quickly without too much interest
but good to see!
respectfully completely disagree
This game is excellent and is always available for very little. Absolutely worth getting on a new platform.
Nobody Saves the World? Really? sheesh, talk about spicy opinions
...alright?
gonna play this respectfully
bought Star Wars: Dark Forces for next to nothing and it only plays on my PC in like a tiny square
time for a remaster/new Star Wars DOOM clone
Why is this pinned? If it's an ad, it needs to be disclosed cos law.
Not excited for the tiresome marketing cycle of teases, ARGs, and random streamer collaborations for the next five months, and then the year after that and after that and after that
How did this get past the approval process with a clear typo in the headline? come on y'all
how can this possibly be reviewed already when the servers have barely been online for long, codes came late, and it's a multiplayer only game that's only just launched today? sus
someone messed up with codes for this on PS too, hence why there's 1 single review for either PS4 or PS5 on Metacritic and nothing really on YT
UTFT
#ad?
I'd put Elden Ring over Bloodborne personally just cos the latter not getting any performance patches or anything makes it feel a bit rough compared to the former
750 words of zero substance bait. Of course it's Kirk McKeand.
Maxis?