From Kotaku:
"Update: Some readers have pointed out that this video may be slowed to give the appearance of longer load times. Make of it what you will!
Update 2: We asked Sony about the theories that the video has been doctored to show slower load times. A spokesperson told us that no one on the GT5 product team in the U.S. had witnessed load times as slow as the one depicted in the video posted here. Has the video been altered? Was there something up with that ...
So basically you're going to go on with your life as usual? I don't understand your comment. How do you further ignore a website other than already not going to it?
Ooh here's an idea, you can rally with all the other people who already don't frequent their site and really hit em' where it hurts.
Oh wait...
@ChronoJoe
No it wasn't, was mine hard to understand? I kind of pointed this out because if he's never been ...
I saw this earlier and apparently pointing out obvious things is frowned upon at n4g.
It's so hypocritical given what people are complaining about. If you're mad at biased news sites then why is this considered a credible source?
The only defense I may have is that this site seems to "report" on gaming news media in general rather than individual games. With their heading being, "And now, the news... about the gaming news."
Umm I don't mean to sound uninformed but when are the other times they've done this? I feel like they would have been called out a lot about this but I just don't remember hearing about kotaku showing bias. Usually when a big name game comes out they do one review of their own and then show an aggregate of a few other sites.
http://kotaku.com/5602329/f...
I know everyone is having fun bashing kotaku for having bias but what about the site that posted this story? Just a quick glance at the articles and they all seem to be sony related. At least for the most part kotaku tries to report on gaming but looking at the front page of this site there are articles that go back to 2009.
Diddy Kong Racing was the shit.
These things are always funny to me. Can someone point out the last move vs. wii comparison? Or since fanboys will bring it up, eyetoy vs. kinect? These would be the most accurate ones to compare since they're so similar. I don't understand why these keep cropping up since they're so different. Would anyone mind starting up these articles, those would have more interesting comments rather than fanboys foaming at the mouth.
There's nothing wrong with the Halo numbers. there's an easy exploit in the 360 Gold membership status in that you get a free month just for signing up with a unique email address. So there can be a difference. Also just because you own the game doesn't mean you have to be the sole user of the disk.
@artsaber
You really think 10 million people who bought and then sold a game would buy it again? Maybe a hundred at the most out of 10 million did this but......
@Omi25p
To be fair Xbreakx360 is showing more signs of either being a pc fanboy or just a 360 hater; "... life L4D that would've had free DLC if I bought in PC..."
I'd say 9 years, Sonic Adventure 2 came out in 2001
Portal 2 is on 360, PC, and ps3. It's not an exclusive.
Wii ripoff, who saw that? They're barely trying to hide it, you even hold the wiimote and nunchuck in the same hands as the wiimote.
Nintendo won this round, get over it. They didn't just bring out 3D, but portable 3D. Skyward Sword, Donkey Kong, Kid Icarus.
Sony relied on other companies to unveil new things at their conference, it was pathetic.
If you read the credits really carefully you can see that it's going to be on the 360 as well. So you're "Ps3 loving to the max!" comment made no sense.
Aren't you worried about a misfired wiimote when playing wii bowling drunk?
imagine the oxymoron of people agreeing or disagreeing with you.
I prefer the 360 but to say games don't sell on the ps3 is just ignorant. Are you that insecure with your preference to go that far?
Holy crap that didn't sound like a spew of Sony fanboy crap. I think this is one of the first times I've seen someone support Sony and I thought, "M'eh, not for me but okay."
That makes no sense. Just because they both are synonyms followed by a number doesn't mean that they're anything alike.
P.S. District 9 sucks, it only gets good reviews because it's one of the few sci-fi movies that have a budget.
You do realize that with the sudden surge of fanboyism anyone that is in direct support or opposition isn't playing their preferred system. Even you who took time out of your gaming to make that observation. It only takes one person to write an article and hundreds more to comment. Any defense or offense you can make to your argument makes your original post obsolete, congrats.
I'm pretty sure that everyone that plays the game would disagree. It may not be a tournament fighter but you can't argue that the game isn't a fighting game. What would you call it if not a fighter?
I wonder how fast kotaku's Microsoft rating will go up on this site if I post this link here:
http://consolebias.com/
Here's the chart at 11:40P.M eastern:
http://i893.photobucket.com...