It's still a PSP. Same gen. Same games and capabilities. Different design.
Internal memory would mean higher price which means more bitching.
Just look at the PSP-Go with internal memory costing almost $100 more than a normal PSP.
I do agree that they did a lot more right with the Vita than they did with the PSP.
___
[ON TOPIC]
Struggling to find an identity? How so? Because it doesn't have a specific gimmick like a 3D effect?
But that's the thing. The PS Vita has quite a lot of features an...
Just move on.
An unnecessary and hardly enjoyable patch since all characters in Diablo look like ants on screen anyway.
I would have preferred a patch that fixes issues with the game first, but instead the PC community had to make nude mods first, like in almost every game lol.
They're two different games. Don't blame Sony for Zipper screwing up SOCOM.
Compare Sly PS2 vs PS3 HD.
http://www.flickr.com/photo...
http://www.flickr.com/photo...
Check Sly's character model.
Compare Ico PS2 vs PS3 HD.
5143d ago 2 agree0 disagreeView comment
This is what the controller should have been:
http://img.gawkerassets.com...
No BS, no gimmicks.
It's a very subjective matter.
If you don't have any interest in other systems exclusives, then whatever system you choose IS 100% to you.
You guys are acting worse than the fanboys you speak of.
None of the comments above you are bashing anyone.
Under a rock, this guy^^
FYI there is a LittleBigPlanet game for the Vita and its an original title, not a port. Same with Killzone. If you even know what a port is.
Let me give you an example:
Uncharted:GA would be an original Vita game.
Gravity Rush would be an new IP.
UMvC3 would be a port.
There More You Know!
So expect new IPs and original titles.
Ghost of Sparta looks amazing in HD.
I want Tales of Xillia.
these Xbox websites always find a way to mention something related to the PS3 for hits. Even when it doesn't make sense.
I think you're right. I haven't played the game since '08 lol.
They are good.
But Halo 3 really wasn't much of a next-gen game compared to Halo 2.
I said their best work was Halo 1 and 2. Not that 3 or Reach weren't any good.
The issue was with the title of #1 itself. Not the reason behind it.
The point was, they should have said "#1 Wii U Games".
Halo 1 and 2 were last gen as well. Just like Half Life 2.
So why would you put Bungie in Valve's place, when their best work was from last gen?
The PS3 base price was $500. These people always talk like $600 was the only option, a price that only lasted 6 months.
And eBay prices don't count at all.
No one had a problem with the Nintendo 3DS releasing at $250.
And after we learned about the Sony "NGP", EVERYONE estimated it being at least $350 to $400 due to its much higher specs.
When the Vita was confirmed at $250, everyone was surprised. It was much cheaper than mo...
as Capcom producer said, they'll only make "horror" Resident Evil games on handhelds, such as RE:Revelations. And main series titles such as RE6 will be all out action and shooting with little to no horror because as he said, they want "Call of Duty numbers". I sh*t you not. That's what pisses me off the most.
You just assumed. Though I'm not surprised how easily some jumped on Sony on this one, even though they're not the only company to do so.
@PopRocks359
Well after 4 other re-releases of OoT and 2 generations later, I would imagine there being some kind of "graphical overhaul" even if it's only in 240p on the 3DS.
Anyway, I see no problem with HD collections.