The reason why Killzone has few jaggies is because of the combination of QAA and motionblur. I liked the game a lot but if theres one thing i hate is QAA it always makes the image look blurry. Sony should just disable QAA cause it only ruins games.
At first i thought that Lens of Truth was being unfair comparing this game to Killzone 2. But then when i saw the comparison i knew why. If Killzone 2 looks better than Crysis imagine what the results would be with Killzone 3? If things follow suit then Killzone 3 will kill crysis in terms of graphics. And if theres any difference between the PS3 and 360 version if they are negative towards the PS3 then Crytek has just been lazy cause there are better looking games on the PS3.
Or in moments when theres a lot of lighrs flashing would be incredible to see.
I know that. which means when a customer goes to buy a console the PS3 has a lot more exclusives than the 360. Which means that unless their a casual they would probably get a PS3.
These are the NintendoHandhelds that i owned in the past
1. Gameboy
2.Gameboy pocket
3. GameboyColor
4. Gameboy Advance
5. DS
6. DS Lite
7. DSI
But with what nintendo is going to do with the 3DS i think that i will pass up on it and get a NGP.
Nintendo is right cause in the end its the consumer who decides.
Dead Space would be incredible with the NGPs screen. Imagine the perfect blacks that you get with oled display
Cause not everyone wants to carry around 2 handhelds.
NGP FTW!!!!!!
a fanboy who is mad cause the PS3 got masseffect. What a cry baby.
Sure the 360 barely has any core exclusives in 2011. But people always forget about the multiplats there are a ton of core multiplats comming out in 2011.
True this is probably the biggest news of January the announcment of the NGP
Everyone knows by now that the NGP is a lot more powerful than the 3DS. What really hinders the 3DS in terms of graphics is when 3D is turned on. And that is because the GPU has to render 2 screens instead of one. Anyways the most important thing are the games and the 3DS is essentially for people who enjoy Nintendo games. The NGP is for people who enjoy games from 3RD party devs. So in my opinion since i enjoy games from Sony the most plus 3rd party games the best handheld for me is the NGP....
Since the NGP doesnt have to produce images at 720P not does it have to support 7.1 Surround sound. It doesnt need bluray
true cause someone for example might get and NGP but not buy any games for it cause of the remote play function
dont have to be an arse. Out of the 2 consoles which are the 360 and PS3 the PS3 version looks the best to me
exactly. For example you cant play a game like Oblivion on the 3DS right cause of the hardware. Or how about GTA4 on the go it would suffer a lot because of the hardware of the 3DS. Or a horror game like deadspace 2 with its incredible lighting i dont see the 3DS capable of reproducing that experience. People always think that imrpoved hardware is a bad thing when in reality it gives the devs more possibilitys when developing the games.
Plus the 3DS main feature is 3D. How can you justify a price of 250€ if you cant see the games in 3D? They should have a 3D and a non 3D version of the handheld.
The difference with the PS3 is that 3D is optional. The quality of the game only degrades when you have it on. So you dont want 3D and want better visuals just dont use it. The same cant be said for Nintendo because they are oblegated to include 3D with every 3DS game.
They could have easily compared it to Killzone 3. But then the differences would be 2 great. They played the beta and both games havent released yet so i dont see why not.