It would be fantastic if multiplat devs try and achieve what PS3 devs have with the Playstation3.
But sadly time is money and the PS3 is hard to develop for.
Im as angry as the hulk stuck in a taxi during rush hour.
http://www.youtube.com/watc...
If Devs say that the 2 are equal that should be true. But in this case Crytek completly lies to us about it. And they even mock PS3 owners and ask them to find differences between the 2. Now thats insult to injury.
I have a feeling that for some reason they want it to sell more on the 360 because of Codename Kingdoms.
Just think about it for a minute. People by Crysis 2 enjoy it on the 360. Then when they see codename Kingdoms they buy it because they enjoyed a game from the dev before.
Yeah that has to be it. People are talking about how horrible the DEMO is and thats why EA pulled the plug. They dont want any bad rap on this game.
Very easy to avoid this. All they had to do was release a demo equal to the 360 version and no one would have complained.
WOW crtyek you did a great job with the online of this game.
It keeps getting bigger and bigger.
Comming from Gearbox it should be good. I just hope they dont screw up the PS3 version though
Another quality title from sony. So so far we have 3 games with a 9.0 and up on metacritic. So far so good.
Only say 1 min of the video.
HOLY CRAP the visuals are so good. I was never expecting them to be this good ever on the PS3. I am so happy that i got proven wrong.
Not really excited for it since its being made by sega. They were great in the past but now they are one of the worse devs on the market.
And another reason why i hate them so much. And that is Bayonetta. PS3 owners know what i am talking about.
A little late guys for this review. You do know that the game came out a long time ago. So why do you write the review now?
I mean it was hyped to hell to be the 360 game with visuals that would crush the PS3 so it got a a lot of attention because of that. Which is why I view this late review as being a little strange.
The PC is the best. But i am sure the PS3 version isnt worth it because Crytek broke the game on purpose. So owners can only buy the 360 version because the PS3 version is unplayble due to its framerate.
Or at least that is what i am hearing in N4G. I havent botherd downloading the demo yet. Heck i got 4 demos installed that i havent played yet on my PS3.
Ok How about your life? The one who looses has to slit his wrists with razor blades and to prove it you have to do it via a web cam.
LOL im just kidding. But you will never be right you know. Only Microsoft is capable of charging you to play online with a P2P based system.
That is why PSN is free to play online. Because it is a open network with an online system similar to those on PCs.
If they charge for PSN devs will charge for PC as well....
I agree not every game needs multiplayer.
A good example is dead space 2. The multiplayer in it is horrible. Dang i have to get the game for my PS3.
Wasnt Haze hyped to hell and back for being the game that would look better than crysis?
Trolls are not very smart in the first place. They always make their posts, piss some people off then they loose bubbles. And in the end they get banned. That is the life of a troll my friend.
Thats pretty easy. They obviously want it to sell more on the 360. And as to why i have no idea.
Let me guess microsoft payed them to make the PS3 version terrible. Just like Microsoft payed activison to wreck the PS3s version of call of Duty Black Ops.
WoW i dont know if i should believe you cause it sounds like a pretty nutty theory to me.
They screwed up period.
Well in that case Nintendo shouldnt have used 3D because it increased the price by 100€. The DS when it first launched was released at a MSRP of 150€ Now the 3DS costs 250€.
Also the NGP will be priced at around 250€ and its extremely easy to develop for as well. So your point in the end is moot.
Monkey Island, Grim Fandango yes those were the days.