usually optional and not required, games should launch in a complete state, of course improvements can be made, but a physical game should need no internet
ok thanks but no thanks Ubisoft, also why is the lead looking like a man ? the actress used to scan is beautiful, someone put effort in to make her worse, why ? never mind its a skip
its a low bar, so i agree it really should
please let somenoe use some buzz words without seeing gameplay, lets call it the game of a generation, a leap that has never been seen before, please drop the propoganda
when you cant make enough from your own platform and pc and you have to go to ps and nintendo you know its a slow transition to 3rd party publishing, and that is fine. Xb never had the thurst or ambition after the 360
and all will end up on playstation, and nintendo, if xbox was doing amazing they would not need ps or nintendo, if gp was amazing they wouldnt need pc. PS has multiple first party games in development that we dont know about. Look at how halo was treated, look at redfall, and look at starfield. Its fine to be loyal and prefer one platoform but to be wilfully ignorant about it just ridiculas.
Just because Xbox has failed they always have to say oh the others are also doing it, no they are not. Great games sell and that hasnt changed, if GP was a huge success XB would not need PS or Nintendo gamers to increase sales.
Subs do not work and when your backed with billions like xb and still cant make good games something is very wrong.
After the gaslighting and lies from IGN over stella blade i would like to see them and kotaku fade away
another console for no one to buy, the series is tracking lower than the xbox one, buy your games and support them
This happens for every game, every single release on every platform, at this point its like saying water is wet. This is not a live service game so its not abnormal
not a single game released this is harsh
do you understand the concept of licensed games? good lord the straw arguments or just lack of actual real information is astouding.
yeah of course because people renting games and not buying them is so much better for studios.
Microsoft has conditioned people not to pay for their hobby or at least not to pay to own anything
who knew renting games and not buying them was bad for devs, its almost like the original format of buying a game to own it is the best way to get more games
probably 7 years out at this point after wasting all that time on factions
exactly, get the game out before PS6 and if it takes crunch, or over time which you get paid for, get on with it
so ready for ps6 ? talk is cheap and im tired of hearing this type of thing, what happened to let the games do the talking ? sonys first party seem to be all silent
as if you dont get paid for crunch, get on with it,
arrowhead confirmed its 50/50 why lie ?
megaton ? so ground breaking sales then ? at a $50 download only title ? that has already been said to be the same length as the last ? dont sequels attempt to improve upon the previous title and try do more?
Ubisoft are going to see this fail and it deserves to, esecially after the whole, gamers need to get used to not owning their games statement. Pricing and paywalls for single player is insane. The trend of making charaters androgynous is clear and has been going on for a while, tied to ESG social credit scores etc, pretend its not real thats fine but its how games are funded these days. You can say it doesnt matter, if that is true why spend time, effort and money changing the characters? Als...