marcofdeath

1. http://share.gifyoutube.com...
2. http://a.pomf.se/ixxuff.gif
3. http://i.minus.com/inYXs6BT...
4. http://image.noelshack.com/...
EASY to do when all you have is one road to go down!
5.

I stopped trying to tell you that one system was more powerful and let the games tell the story. Well here is the 1st video that i know Driver Club CAN't MATCH on any level.

Note:
0:40
0:52
1:19
1:34
1:37

https://www.youtube.com/wat...

I stopped trying to tell you that one system was more powerful and let the games tell the story. Well here is the 1st video that i know Driver Club CAN't MATCH on any level.

Note:
0:40
0:52
1:19
1:34
1:37

https://www.youtube.com/wat...

This may be the new build of the game?

XB1 is the most powerful system at this time.
CPU XB1 853MHz V.s. PS4 800MHz
XB1 winner

GPU XB1 1.3TF V.S. PS4 1.8TF
PS4 Winner

Memory XB1 276GB/s Peak VS 176GB/s PEAK
XB1 Winner

As you can see PS4 has only 1 win,
It's not the most powerful, it just has the most
powerful GPU only. Everything else is just okay..

XB1 continuous improvement over time. This is just the start. ...

Not the PS4 blow out like at launch. XB1, like a bottle of wine, gets better over time!

@imt558 & @ziggurcat

You guys mad? all, poor babies. See what a little schooling can do. In one year.
It's been a bad week for you, let's review.
1.176GB/s is PS4's peak according to Sony's PDF.
Oles Shishkovstov:"
As for ESRAM performance - it is sufficient for the GPU we have in Xbox One. Yes it is true, that the maximum theoretical bandwidth - which is somewhat comparable to PS4 -"

The hole world...

@kingdip90
"You also understand that hardware cannot magically improve also right?"
Xb1 Developers are not writing to the metal. This is big, that's a lot of power left unused. They are on PS4. Every thing that has been running on XB1 from 3RD party developers are just using 1.3TF no 2x closed box performance.
They are not using ESRAM to DDR3 back flow yet.
No one can tell me why they need a 5.1tf GPU to get FM5 running 1080p @60FPS. (i know why)....

Well this is right they said this at the time.
"Target hardware less powerful than high-end PCs at launch"
Page 13

http://www.crytek.com/downl...

KEY words "AT LAUNCH".........

XB1 getting better over time, as i have said in the past...

PS4 is = to a HD7970 that's good power.

@BX81
Well let me just say that i called this mouths ago.
I told PEOPLE here that the closed box 2X performance increase of consoles 2XCBP, in this case PS4 was 3.2TF or = to a HD7970. These people don't like that, why? PC people think that it's just 1.8TF do to being a PC lover that hate console,so they need it to be as low as possible, and PS4 people don't like it do 1 main reason, more on that later. Do you remember the 14+4 thing from a while ago, well it...

So let me get it out first, i was right about the 2X performance increase of consoles.......
PS4 is a HD7970 at 3.2TF close box performance 2x.
ESRAM is = to GDDR5's maximum theoretical of 176GB/s. This speaks volumes. We know that ESRAM's effective bandwidth is 140- 150GB/s so you make up your mind.
PS4 is coding to the METAL and XB1 is not,this is big trouble for one of these consoles?

One last thing (the first party in house studio TURN 10)...

@larrysdirtydrawss

Where have you seen where developers have said, PS4's memory is FASTER than XB1? (other than the ones working with SONY) I count 0... As far as game's go XB1 first party games have shown to be superior. The hardware is doing more, AKA FMS5 (1080P 60FPS), FH2 (open world), and QB(best looking at GC), and you forgot one line that i didn't add last time,
"That's not some "diagnostic or some simulation" case or something ...

Here is where a little common sense comes in.
XB360 had 10MBs of EDRAM it did 1080p.......
It's not about it being a bottleneck it's how hard it is to use the tools to take advantage of ESRAM.
AS far as speed well XB1 has the advantage.
PS4 GDDR5 is 176GB/s PEAK.......
XB1 ESRAM is 204GB/s PEAK.......
What a lot of you forget is that your render target,

"The Xbox 360 was the easiest console platform to develop for, ...

The The Order had to use BLACK BARS (NOT 1080p) to match Quantum Break. It also was at GAMES COM and no one said it was the best looking game at the show or played well. I win again.
Still looking for that game that's better looking than RYSE?
Still looking for OPEN WORLD racing in Driver Club? Maybe in 2 years.
Still waiting for Sony to pull that PDF with 135GB/s?
Still waiting for you to show me something from Sony that said that it's not 135GB/s eff...

Like i said it's the lead platform for this game.....
Why because it has the fastest CPU. 853MHz to 800Mhz
The fastest memory system. Peak 286GB/s V.S. 176GB/s
The fastest Ram to CPU. PEAK 30GB/s V.S 20GB/s
The fastest ram to GPU. PEAK 286GB/s Y.S 176GB/s
Next up is the the best GPU. ?
It's still got time......

Your righ! Now they know that one of there pillars of reinforcement fact the PS4 is more powerful. "135GB/s effective bandwidth", UBsoft using Xb1 as it's lead platform for the Division and the new Assassin's Creed, the frostbite engine running hardline at 1080p, still not a single game to match Ryse and how the best looking game at gamescom Quantum Break, in conjunction with their BS excuses of why PS4 is superior, like ESRAM is a bottleneck, or PS4 GPU is 50% more power...

@imt558

I was right about PS4's weak GDDR5 (terrible memory system) only being 135GB/s. You still don't "GET IT", 176GB/s is PS4's theoretical bandwidth, it's effective bandwidth is 135GB/s. Just like XB1's theoretical is 286GB/s theoretical bandwidth, but it's effective bandwidth is only 190-200GB/s, as said in the digital foundry article.

Developers are bound by agreements, and in the gaming business are always last to kn...