He never said Bloodborne was the best, just that he prefers it over DS3. None of these games are 'better' than the others, it all just boils down to personal preference.
Edit: @Ratchet8, Bloodborne is the only one I've played, and yeah, I can't see myself enjoying the souls games more, but thats is it my opinion, and other people might have a different one.
I gotta disagree, I think a direct sequel would be the best way to continue that franchise. Yeah, it was a too short, but the gameplay was serviceable and the narrative was actually pretty great and set up an interesting conflict that should be shown in a longer sequel.
It can't be Jason Todd because he's featured in the Red Hood preorder pack
Doesn't matter, people are still excited for the game, and there's always a chance it could show up at gamescom.
Kingdom Hearts for sure
That or a leftovers game would be awesome
The two games actually don't have similar premises at all. In far cry 3 you're a guy who's stuck on an island and has to get his friends off the island. In far cry 4 you come to kyrat to throw your mothers ashes off the highest mountain in the country. And there's a backstory with the protagonists parents and pagan min, and a civil war that happened years ago so far cry has a much more intricate premise
Halo's story was very vague when CE came out. Yes, that did have a better story but people were just as confused about the forerunners as we are about the traveler and the darkness. You just have to be open minded about it because it could lead to an amazing story in the sequel.
There is so much evidence to back this up.
"I walked beneath the blossoms. The light came from ahead and the shadows of the flowers were words. They said things but I will not write them here.
At the end of the path grew a flower in the shape of a Ghost. I reached out to pluck it and it cut me with a thorn. I bled and the blood was Light.
The Ghost said to me: You are a dead thing made by a dead power in the shape of the dead. All you will ever do is kill. You do ...
Where'd you draw that conclusion from? It seems like there still a lot we don't keno about the character and what we do know isn't enough to draw any conclusions from. Rocksteady really is doing a good job keeping his identity a secret.
I wouldn't mind this game being action oriented considering we already have the amazing telltale series
It's going to be digital and probably cost $20-30.
I personally think sony won, but I'd be interested in hearing why you think Microsoft won.
True, but the fact that it's all non canon means they can use him in the new trilogy.
There's no reason for them to. Both Arkham Asylum and Knight have been huge successes, both critically and commercially.
Guerrilla's new ip will probably be shown. They had a trailer ready for E3 but sony decided not to play it for whatever reason.
I know but chances are they're going to make him a reimagining or amalgation of multiple characters. The last batman villain created for a game was Sin Tzu and he was quickly forgotten. So if they want the Arkham knight's reveal to be a shocker it'd be best if it was a reimagining of an existing character. Maybe Terry McGinnis or Damian Wayne! That being said I wouldn't mind if he was a completely new character given how awesome he looks.
So the Arkham Knight isn't Jason Todd. Back to speculation.
Episode 7 comes out on December 18, 2015.
Now if only he were voiced by Nikolaj Coster-Waldau...