still better then the entire RE6 demo.
Why dont you keep your Vita to play good games, and buy a cheap cellphone to make calls?
The real problem is what people think about the "big power" will mean. As I stated before, and you can confirm it with your gaming PC: the "next gen" is here, and it's called PC. Now, as a PC gamer, do you really notice any difference between playing, let's say, COD in Mid and Extreme settings? Do you see developers pulling out games that blow you away, just because they run in a machine of a zillion teraflop? If they really wanted to, they'd just do it.
it's funny that you make that point. It's a kind of eternal cicle of contradiction, used to look good when someone is cornered. It's something like:
>I'd pay more for more power
-then buy a PC
>But I love console games, even if graphics are not as good.
-Then, why do you want more power?.
>Because yes. It's cool, and make games better.
-Then buy a PC, if graphics make games better. Since PC has more power, g...
Now you're starting to sound like Crytek.
BTW, "bleeding edge" technology is called PC. Now, you can have bleeding edge tech in a console, but at what cost? And yes, I'm refering at money.
Obviously, when you make a good game 4XAAA and a trillion polygons shouldn't make a difference.
But times changes.
PD: I want another Unreal Tournament game. Is it really that hard?
"The 3DS is trash for kids"
Are you implying kids doesnt deserve the right to play? That gaming consoles and games should be made to pleasure your tastes? That every gamer in the world is a "hardcore" "mature" "gamer" like you... and Mika?
God saves us from fanboys like you. I'll just assume Sony gives you a penny for every console sold. Oh, wait.
says who?
...because transforming vehicles is the most original idea in the entire universe.
There are a lot of factors to take in account about being digital retail only. In my case, is a robust no. I live in Colombia, and communication technologies are not exactly the best here. My internet conection is only 4Mb, wich gives me a whooping 550kb on downloading, meaning a big game (let's say a single layer bluray PS3's game) would take, woth a lot of luck, 25-30 hours in the process. That if I dedicate all the bandwith for it.
Second, the world has something a...
"let's make a list of popular franchises! And put a controversial title!"
Yo bro, I heard you like 360, so we put a 360 in your WiiU so you can 360 while you WiiU.
-end sarcasm-
I was just giving options to the "problem" the designer of the game is adressing. Sorry if you dont like'em. Oh, and yes, you can always block people using the quick input method.
...then dont use it while playing. I dont see why you should, anyway, maybe to assign quick access to special moves like the 3DS version of SF IV (wich is so simplistic in design you dont even have to see it, one in every corner), or just use the pro controller, or just dont use the screen, and give us the option to play all the game in the controller's screen.
I dont see why the big deal with the screen in a figthing game.
Oh. Enlight me.
Why are so many people convinced that "second stick" means "better controls"?
With a control that normal, it'll be really hard.
Oh, wait.
I dont get it. You buy EVERY version of EVERY console? Is there a greedy company behind you, pointing a gun at you and making you buy every product in the market?
Just dont buy it. Meh.
second stick. The famous second stick. I mean, the second stick that barely four games uses (MGS3, Monster Hunter, RE... and I believe I'm forgotting one). It's so important.
Nobody really uses it, the hardcore FPS gamers are putting all their money on the Vita, so why put the second stick? To render 3DS without it useless?
It doesnt make any sense from the start.
As a no PS3 actual user, as long as this is cheaper and smaller than the actual PS3 slim, I'll buy one. I'll be seeing the screen and not the console, after all.