I dont have anything against 3D. Movies look good, games look rather good, it's funny, and Nintendo 3Dland show me that you can use 3D to enchance the gameplay.
What I hate is 3D tv's being so expensive. But that's not sony or PS3 or games problem.
It's funny that everyone wants a new IP for a Nintendo console, then a new console arrives with 5+ new IP's, and then someone doesnt want to buy it because it doesnt have a classic Nintendo game.
dat smoothness... and same game?
And still, the experience is still the same, in basic settings, medium, ultra or console.
Saving the obvious differences between graphics and gameplay,the basic idea of the game (changing what happened in the past) kinda remind me of Ghost Trick, another Capcom game. Hope it'll be as good as Ghost Trick.
And worse that that:
What happens when a console "win"? The other companies and their fans get destroyed, or become slaves?
What does a console need to "win"? More sales? More games? Global control? more exclusives? highest score in metacritic?
What does a fan get when the console of his/her choise "win"? Why is a fan in the first place? Does the fan get a penny every time the console is sold? free games? a bigge...
If haters outrage just for one game, imagine what they will do if Nintendo buys platinum games.
Haters will outrage IN CAPITAL LETTERS.
The WiiU do something right: Outrage
The WiiU do something wrong: Outrage
The WiiU does nothing: Outrage
The WiiU does something neutral: Outrage.
It has been the same since the Wiiu was announced.
I wont say these aren't bad news, but's no surprising in a Nintendo console. I'm kind of sad, but I was expecting it.
There goes my japanese lessons...
I wont say these aren't bad news, but's no surprising in a Nintendo console. I'm kind of sad, but I was expecting it.
There goes my japanese lessons...
Because sequels changing between consoles are a new and bad thing when nintendo does it. It's like we've forgotten that MGS were in the NES, FF series in the SNES, it's nothing new. And about the price: I'm pretty sure it wouldn't be a problem if the game were to be released in a Sony or MS new plattform. Everybody would be gladly paying for the console. But for Nintendo? No way. Because no.
And the gamecube & the GBA can do what the PS3 & vita ca do (obviosuly saving the differences in power)
And we all know that the combo is expensive, and the developers will under use it, so the games wont ever be as specialized in dual screen as the WiiU. Get over it already. I dont know what sony is trying to prove.
Wow. The console is really, really small. And it looks great.
The PS3 is a HD PS2 with more features and more power. And the same controller.
The xBox360 is a HD xBox with more features and more power. And the same controller.
Sorry to burst your imagination bubble.
.
So activision can charge extra? no thanks.
In no particular order
Wario Ware: Smooth Moves
Boom Blox
Sin & Punishment: Star Successor
Kirby's Epic Yarn
Okami
Zack & Wiki: Quest for Barbaros' Treasure
Muramasa: The Demon Blade
Punch-Out!!
Sonic Colors
Red Steel 2
Mario Kart Wii
Monster Hunter Tri
No more heroes 1 & 2
Dead Space Extraction
Tatsunoko vs. Capcom
Twilight Princess
You bought the wrong games. Not every game with a "party" in the name is supposed to be a party. I have more than 40 quality games in my Wii.
I remember using the DS in RockBand Wii, the GBA with the Gamecube, the Pokemon Gameboy cartdriges in the N64, the Gameboy games in the SNES, and the power gauntlet in the NES.
Problem?
As long as they're options, is OK. If you're a "hardcore" gamer, then you just can set those options off and problem solved.
Dont get why people should get angry about this.