Machomania

Contributor
CRank: 11Score: 31730

Because Epic ARE paying the difference. It was just the $10 off that Epic were giving away, there was no other discount for Vampire the Masquerade Bloodlines 2.

Paradox didn't suffer any costs for Vampire discount, Epic soaked it all up. This was one time that Epic offered something that is actually good for gamers and Paradox pulled out.

My best guess is Paradox didn't want Epic to devalue Vampire in players' eyes. Once you buy it for $10 of...

2440d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

This is fake. It wasn't Galyonkin who called them greedy. He responded to someone else who said that.

His actual statement is that *IF* Paradox were greedy, Epic's sale would be a perfect thing for them and they would have no reason to pull out.

I'm personally not a fan of Galyonkin, he's said a pile of shady things in the past but this is not one of them.

2440d ago 23 agree2 disagreeView comment

It's actually not AAA. Was priced $39.99 from the get-go.

People still have a bad taste in their mouth after all the fuckery on the Konami-Kojima relations but MG: Survive is still not bad to try out as a freebie. Mostly because it's an MGS GZ/Phantom Pain asset flip.

2461d ago 0 agree1 disagreeView comment

Could be story reveal purposes as Christopher said, could be a way to entice players to play story mode. NetherRealm really did a good job once again with a story that consists of about three hours of cutscenes in total.

It's even worth watching on YouTube imo.

The actual grievance here is WB / NetherRealm's borderline scam where they rely on people not knowing they can unlock her through story mode in order to grab some extra cash. Frost's D...

2463d ago 1 agree0 disagreeView comment

Bumbumin's Creed

2476d ago 2 agree0 disagreeView comment

I think it's just one week ahead of those who don't hold the Season Pass

2501d ago 14 agree0 disagreeView comment

ARK: Survival Evolved has a Season Pass. If it released as ARK DLC, Season Pass owners wouldn't need to pay for it again.

Since it released as a separate game, people need to pay for it, despite having ARK Season Pass. It's a game that has identical start to ARK, same UI, gameplay and graphics. It runs poorly and it's coming from the same developers - the people who released ARK DLC while the game was still in Early Access.

2584d ago 21 agree1 disagreeView comment

No mention of Dunwich Building from FO3 though. Easily beats the trap garage

2617d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

Just what can they possibly have against a cartoon bear?

2617d ago 3 agree0 disagreeView comment

Anthem delay was already debunked by Ben Irving.

2618d ago 7 agree3 disagreeView comment

No it hasn't. The game launched six years ago and there have been countless games with run of the mill hero stories since.

2625d ago 0 agree2 disagreeView comment

Why is everyone overrating this game? The gameplay was sub-par, on PC at least as I don't know what the standards are on the consoles.

There is nothing brutal in the combat, plot points were pushed too hard which led me to figure out something is off early on, and by the end, the plot twist wasn't surprising.

It failed to make me feel bad because the game is linear, with the above mentioned forced plot points. I didn't feel like I made those...

2626d ago 0 agree5 disagreeView comment

Gonna be a great Christmas for those who wanted Spidey but couldn't afford PS4 on top of the game

EDIT: Fixed the end of the sentence for clarity

2626d ago 16 agree1 disagreeView comment

Especially good if you live in Chicago. :/

2626d ago 1 agree2 disagreeView comment

The game is looking sweet, especially for an indie title. The best part is it seems to be rather deep, as I'm sick of Bethesda-like "wide as the ocean, deep as a puddle" mentality.

2628d ago 1 agree0 disagreeView comment

Feels bad for the Chinese players especially. They could be potentially seen as the black sheep in the community, even though this wasn't their choice.

2634d ago 2 agree0 disagreeView comment

Good to know I'm not the only one that gets a rash as soon as someone mentions games as a service.

2643d ago 2 agree0 disagreeView comment

Just like they pointed out - this doesn't feel like it should have been multiplayer. That direction might as well just be an excuse to pump out microtransactions.

2645d ago 2 agree0 disagreeView comment

Wasn't this already confirmed back when it was delayed?

2645d ago 0 agree7 disagreeView comment

That is a good point, but the support responses were so horrid that they don't mention this a single time through all the screenshots that the dude posted.

2651d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment