Indeed, and only time will tell on that one.
Interesting, I hadn't thought of PB and Topware (including Reality Pump) could be good ones to grab.
And Reach.
No they didn't as far as I'm aware no official fixes or patches have ever been released not a good show, luckily someone fixed it for them and it runs great with that fix applied.
Indeed, and I'm thinking of another play through before 2 drops.
@Eonjay
I concede this is a completely different topic.
Indeed it is but no game is first party exclusive as the dev studios are not owned/or asked by any of those you mentioned to not appear on the competitors chips, no matter how you try and spin it.
Stop I can't take anymore.
"Some games are only on PC like Quake, Total War, World of Warcraft, and many more "
Exclusives yes, first party no, devs are not signed to a console manufacturer on PC.
Full frontal tanks FTW.
"Not exactly screaming the need for a physical copy. Actually kind of a waste to go through all that production and packaging for something like that."
And yet they are doing just that making physical copies for other countries, odd to limit it if you are already manufacturing them.
I see, for some reason I was locked onto it being about FF, maybe I shouldn't post first thing in the morning.
What games were exclusive? I can only think of the very early entry's that were exclusive later titles (7 onwards) were on PC (now the early remasters are there too) as well as console.
Sadly as pointed out in the comments on that article most are playing through the games/Bethesdas launcher and not Steam, the author only looked at and referenced the Steam stats.
Indeed they really are not doing themselves any favours.
When are Bluehole going to change their name to Brownholes?
Are those bugs present in the PC version? Asking as that was the version reviewed here.
Personally I'll be waiting until a year or two after release to buy any new console, did it this gen as well whereas I used to buy on release (or as close to) before.
I agree on the visuals for the handheld, but I reckon the cost cutting by not re-coding the game for the Switch had a big part to play. Yes I hope the next one also makes it across properly for Switch only owners (I also own other consoles and a gaming PC).
Without losing quite a bit of eye candy to make it run on the Switch hardware itself, then yes. Also means they save money by not having to rework it for the Switch. The rental scheme behind it sucks imo, they should give you access to other games for that price.
Indeed, they said something they shouldn't have about the TLoU 2 showing, no need to miss out on a game over that tbh.