WoW has been bad for 4 or 5 years now so I don't have high hopes for their next MMO.
Yeah, this is nice for those who live in a country that has Club Nintendo, but unfortunately we do not over here where I live.
Fire Emblem especially is an awesome game and SMT IV looks great.
Pikmin 3 launches this month in Europe and hopefully Wii U starts to pick up on sales little by little. Next month it's TW101, and then the system is going to get good games at a steady pace from that point on.
I'll hopefully get it by the end of this year.
Maybe so, but I wouldn't want to spend hundreds of euros on a system just because I could play the game on the go I played years ago.
It's cool to have, sure, but not worth the money.
I seriously don't hope the remote-play feature is the only thing that Sony is hoping to drive the Vita forward.
I mean, "You have to own our home console system to fully enjoy our portable machine" doesn't sound good to me. Playing PS4 game on the go is a good idea, though.
I'm not planning to buy a PS4 until at least 2015, anyway.
I'd really like to get a Vita at some point, but there just aren't enough interesting Vita-only titles for me on the system. Actually, Gravity Rush is the only exclusive game that I'd like to get but that game alone hardly justifies the purchase.
The other good games the system has are already on some other system. The hardware is great, but to me the software side of the system is lacking.
If anything, Nintendo should consider bringing back some of their old IPs like Star Fox for example.
The thing is, Nintendo does have so many franchises that cover many different genres that I can't help but to wonder "Do they actually REALLY need that new IP? They've got platformers, action adventure titles, RPGs, a shooter, kart racers and some life sims like Animal Crossing for example.
I think it's a good approach, but it was only limited to certain stores ONLY in the US. I think they should do this at Europe and Asia too, because I would certainly like to play these games.
Yes, sure is worrying when the 3DS is making Nintendo lots and lots of money. The price cut was necessary for it to succeed.
I'd much rather want Bioware to read this. DA2 was a much worse game than Skyrim was.
Nah, I'm fairly sure it'll look significantly better on PC compared to its console counterparts. The framerate is 60+ as opposed to 30 on consoles, too.
No doubt the game will look and play great on all platforms, though. I'm just going to play this game on the platform I've played TW1 and TW2 on. I'll get to import my save data :p
This was the best game of E3 in my opinion. Nothing else didn't look nearly as interesting and awesome as this one did.
I think neither is harder than the other. If you played Demon's souls first for example, you wouldn't feel that Dark Souls is as hard because the games play pretty much the same so you would already be good at DaS when you start playing it for the first time.
I went for DaS first and I didn't think that DeS was that hard at all and I prefer DaS to DeS, simply because it was my first Souls game.
@jcnba28
Yeah, I know and I completely agree with you.
I'd much rather have 4 hours of -fun- gameplay, than have 20 hours of mind-numbingly boring or mediocre gameplay.
It's how much fun you have playing that really counts in my opinion.
New IP? Why? If anything, they should revive some of their old IPs, like Star Fox for example. Nintendo has so many IPs covering many different genres it would difficult to come up with a new one, nor do they need to.
Their games always introduce new and fun mechanics and are more often than not fun to play.
Oh, I wonder why he's getting annoyed at people when literally hundreds of people ask him the same questions every day. I'd get annoyed too at that point.
Why is Kirby so cute?
I wish I had been there to try it out. Donkey Kong Country 2 is one of my all-time favorites. I love it and I have fond memories of it :)
Because "You have to spend another 400 euros if you really want to enjoy the Vita" doesn't sound very tempting. At least not to me.