LAWMAN

Member
CRank: 5Score: 3690

Obviously no one has played the game, there isn't any actual gameplay footage available, so as far as we know, this game could be stupid at best.

This game has been seriously over-hyped by both camps.

7099d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

then this would be yet another example of MS or Sony misstating the truth . . .

Or as some of the fanwhores call it . . . LIES

7104d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

Wow, what it must be like to be a big MS fanwhore. Looking for speculative stories, trying to convince people not to buy a PS3 because I lack the self-esteem. Also, to realize that I could stick to my own good system that I like, but instead I feel threatened by good competition (even though good competition is good for all consumers).

Wow, what it must be like in the paranoid world of fanwhores . . .

7106d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

Again, I really don't like FPS, but I have to say that this and Restistence look fantastic. Still, if I had to pick, I would probably choose GoW just beacause it's third person.

7108d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

the screens from Resident Evil 4 (on both Game Cube and PS2) look noticably better than this trash on either the 360 or PS3.

7109d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment
7109d ago

You may not be a fan of MGS and that's fine, you deserve your own opinion, but you should be up-to-date on your facts.

MGS does not sho pre-rendered CGI . . . every PS MGS game in the past has only demonstrated and used real in-game footage both in the trailers and within the game. Even the trailer "spoofs" use in-engine graphics and so what you see is what you get.

MGS is arguably the most popular franchise on the PS systems and even MGS3 graphics riv...

7109d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

I really don't like FPS but this one looks pretty tight. I might get it if the reviews are great. Even on Youtube and filmed with a camera on a TV it still looks fantastic.

7109d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

Don't forget Australia . . .

7110d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

Actually, I like the 360. I actually want the 360 to do well. But I can't stand fanwhores that spread speculation because it damages the credibility of the system as a whole.

The reason why I don't like you Jigg is because even though you might have some good points that 360 fans appreciate, you start all your posts with "PS3 IS PS2.5 ROTGLMFAO!!! PS3 IS TRASH!!" or "ANOTHER DUMB STORY BY A DUMB PS3 FAN!!!!" Also between your few good points all you do is...

7110d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

1) Because the PS3 and Wii haven't even been released yet.

Wow, what a stupid fanwhore-filled article. Just look at the poster's past posts - not a single one neutral. . .

7110d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

Well if you look at the comments within that article you will see a link to the 360 version . . . not any better.

I agree the screens look like crap. This could be because we don't have the capability to view them on a HD set with the PS3 or 360 as of yet. Or it could be that it plain sucks.

7113d ago 0 agree1 disagreeView comment

The link takes me to a story about Blazing Angles Squadron, not F.E.A.R. I am not familiar with this franchise so maybe I'm missing something. . . .

7114d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

Games two years down the road will need more than DVD-9 for large RPG games. I really would have liked this for my 360.

I think it's funny that 360 fans are in so much denial that HD-DVD gaming could be something spectacular.

Think about this . . . what if MS said that the add-on would in fact play HD-DVD games and had plans on releasing them in the near future? Would you have said "MS, please don't do that, we really don't want to have the ability to play...

7114d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

Actually, it's posted in both PS3 and 360.

7116d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

All the reviews that state that HD-DVD is superior to Blu-Ray is based on one (1) Blu-Ray player. To make a conclusion that PS3 has lost because of a few reviews are presumptuous at best. First, Sony and other 3rd parties have not released their Blu-Ray players. Second, the PS3 games are standard Blu-Ray format and therefore just because Blu-Ray may not be the winner doesn't necessarily mean that PS3 will lose the next generation battle.

For everyone that is posting that HD-...

7116d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

Actually, it's hypothetically and it means to give a theoretical situation. But I digress. . .

I'm have been labled as both a MS fanboy and Sony Fanboy. I believe that I'm both I guess. I think that they both have great and essential products for entertainment purposes.

However, I think that good competition means that in the end we all get the better deals. So if Sony becomes the outright winner, that will mean even more expensive games and hardware for the ...

7116d ago 1 agree0 disagreeView comment

And the PS3 has 60 gb. . .

However, I really like the idea that MS has given the consumers an option to purchase the HD-DVD unit. I really do think that MS did us a disfavor by neglecting the wireless. Everyone here that says that you don't need wireless, well that's fine, but many, many people (like me) find it very convenient. I'm not too excited to purchase another $100 for wireless. In fact, since I'm getting a PS3 as well, I'll probably use that for my wireless needs (...

7116d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

Thanks for owning up.

Yes, I do believe that both consoles do/will rock. We will have better games this generation than any other - on both the 360 and PS3!

7117d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

Umm, now I'm a MS fanwhore huh? Just two comments ago I was accused for bring a Sony Fanboy LMAO!!!. Hey Killzone, do yourself a favor, click on my name and read some of my previous comments and the tell me again that I'm a MS Fanboy LOL.

7117d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment