KrisButtar

1) We can not choose our alliance which totally takes away from "our personal story and plot." For example did all the Bretons that were born and raised in Skyrim(some maybe even for generations) pack up and move to Highrock to be part of the "Breton" Alliance? I doubt it.

2) All of Tamriel is not open to the player because its not even finished. That doesn't seem very "sandbox" to me

3) PvP looks cool, point taken there

Think PC will get the 13 trilogy or the upcoming games? I honestly thought SE already released them on PC as they are 3rd party. I wonder why they skip PC ports.

From what I remember they would not comment on it but I remember rumors of it being F2P

1st I want to say I am getting this game. The problem with ESO is they have done wrong and I think they are deserving of all the bad press.

They advertised the game as "Skyrim with friends" which is not true in so many ways. They should have advertised it differently IMO because that "idea" brings a lot of problems to the table.

Putting the Imperials behind the pay wall, and it look like they are going to be the best tanks in the game beca...

When are the current gen consoles getting Minecraft? Its taking forever

I was hoping the Microtransactions would fail and they wouldn't try it again but now we will see them more often from Take Two.

If every game had Kinect features, I think the resolution issue could be justified. The Kinect is already taking up resources, might as well put it to use.

As rich as Microsoft is they could pay the 3rd parties to stuff Kinect features into every multiplat. Then it wouldn't be so much about the resolution and people like Boyd wouldn't have to try so hard.

"Why the hell is this an article on N4G?"

Its an opinion piece. You can write an opinion piece and submit it with a different view than Pete Dodd if you choose.

Edit: BTW I don't agree with his opinion as well.

Are the 360 and PS3 going to get release dates?

I pre-ordered for the simple bonus "any race any alliance" or I wouldn't be able to play with friends, which I think is the whole point of an MMO.

I doubt this game will be worth the sub fee but I have no problem paying the purchase price to play for a month. I did it with FF14.

OT: I actually like this style PvP instead of 1v1 which is what I thought the game had at 1st. I don't like 1v1 and had no interest in PvP until I seen how it was do...

Min doesn't look great but it does look playable kinda like PS2 games. lol. I'm going to be pre-ordering it on consoles so I''m hoping it looks as good as the max settings.

$60 to play a game for a month, I must be crazy

In Auction Houses that I seen, everything is over priced anyways and I understand that RMTs are like a plague. I don't think the auction house is the problem, I think its a poor solution for a bad system.

Why don't MMOs have an economy more in tune to say Skyrims where you get decent coin for selling stuff instead of the usual pennies that are offered in most MMOs. If money was as easy to come by like in Skyrim there would be no need for Auction Houses. There likely ...

I can't agree to that list

That is a big difference between the 2. The min settings look pretty bad next to the max. No console footage has been shown to do a graphics comparison. Which would be interesting to see how the new consoles stack up against the min/max settings.

I never understood why selling items in MMOs to NPC give you so little in return. Is it to make you use an "action House" system or is it there just to make it so you have to play longer. I guess what I'm saying is I don't see why it doesn't work like single play games.

In FF14, I just gather and craft everything I need myself because I don't like the whole economy system in MMOs and I will try and do the same in ESO.

Graphics matter to me in a way because if I had 2 copies of the same game, which played the same, but one had prettier graphics, I would pick the one that looked prettier. Would anyone really choose the uglier one?

I hope this game is really good when it releases as its getting a lot of press and if its not, we will never hear the end of it.

The original version was pretty bad, wonder if there will be an upgrade to gold version DLC. I hope Gold is much better

One would think lawyers would have learned from the past loop holes not to allow it to happen again. I personally would let the X1 have this as an exclusive because with the amount of money that would likely be spent to get it on a Sony platform, could be spent in better ways. I'm sure some Sony Fans maybe disappointed but I don't see the reward being worth the price. Fans can wait until TitanFall 2 IMO

I'm not understanding why people are saying it could release as the Definitive Edition or Sigma version? Wouldn't that have been covered in the contact? If that was possible, I bet the lawyers at MS are slick enough not to allow a loop hole like that happen. I don't believe for for a second that this game will grace a Sony console

Maybe they will port Skyrim to current gen. Seems like a better idea than ESO to many