In my opinion, they will announce that they will be bringing games to other platforms maybe not day one. Also, this does not affect Xbox fanbase at all because they can still play the games on game pass.
If people on other consoles want to play, they have to pay full price or wait for a seal, unless game pass can be brought to other platforms
Just like when PlayStation brought their games to PC early on, they had some PlayStation fans mad but now no one c...
The is the absolute best decision for gaming. Fanboys may think taking games away from a platform is good but business wise it makes absolutely no sense. MS can still release them day one on gamepass and if there are still millions who are willing to pay full price for the same game on another platform than why not?
This may them testing the water to see what kind of blowback to expect. I think if true this is a great thing for gaming (even if games launched timed exclus...
So this isn’t an always online GAAS and can be played offline single or multiplayer
I think there could be some validity to this claim. Up until very recently Xbox corporate have been busy with acquisitions and dealing with world wide government bodies to approve their deals
When people show you who they are believe them instead of wanting to give benefit of the doubt
1- MS said their goal is to grow GP by huge amount or they may leave the business and become 3rd party
2- launching a console is a multi billion dollar...
Play this in summer of 2025 for optimal performance and bug fixing. Consider this a early access game
This will launch day one on PS6
Exactly I am atleast glad we got some good remakes and remasters out of this deal
Good job gamers keep speaking with your wallets by buying more micro transactions and than asking why publishers are now charging for features which used to be free or unlocked by simply playing the games
Unlimited health ammo and money
Infinite XP
big head mode
New game plus
Now sold to us as micro transactions
Why did they buy so many studios if they couldn’t manage them and gave enough resources? They have so many legendary IP’s but their management and resources aren’t enough. Honestly they must merge or be acquired otherwise they will fire most of their staff and only fund few projects while gamers wait for their favorite games
Would we be surprised if this games end up selling really well though? Because I fully expect this game to set and break some records for rocksteady because numbers can be twisted to paint certain picture
We can all agree that we are against companies announcing record profits yet laying off large number of its staff. CEO’s and executives get their bonuses but actual earners are fired
Gaming changed when it became way too big for suits to ignore the revenue. And now suits decide what’s best for gaming without really understanding the industry. Hedge fund companies want return on investment even at cost of future revenue and growth
No gamers are tired of this man saying one thing and doing another. But his defenders say PlayStation fans do it too
It doesn’t make it better no matter who does it
I understand your point but than if there are sequels developers can use the data to go with ending which was selected by majority
This will do well because for honor got so much hate and yet that game has been going well for years now
That in itself is reason enough to give the option to gamers IMO
If ND left it up to the gamers I wonder how many would have chosen revenge ending by the end? I think it would have been a case study(only accounting the 1st play through since many who replay would want to see the other ending)
I never played the 2nd game. It has nothing to do with politics, feminism or killing of a main character. ND could have definitely handled how to tell the story it better and we can all agree with
For me the first game is simpl...
I somewhat agree with you but there aren’t many defending PlayStation executives like they do for Phil in Xbox side
But you are right fanboys aren’t good for gaming and their mindset overall isn’t healthy gaming community
I personally don’t care anymore because these greedy corporations aren’t our friends. They want to control the content, they want to control our options on using that said content
If PlayStation executives are smart they should push physical like when they gained a lot of momentum going against the DRM policies of original Xbox one
Yes digital sales make for 65-70% of revenue but that doesn’t mean publishers should give up on 30% of revenue. There is ...
It was sold on the promise of single player content that was cancelled and you know gamers don’t speak with their wallets
Otherwise we wouldn’t see micro transactions generating billions on yearly basis from games which cost full price
In my humble opinion
Do you have any data that backs up this claim that Xbox is more profitable than PlayStation? It doesn’t sell more games, it doesn’t sell more hardware
Xbox used its parent company funds to buy publishers. And I stand by my point:
It hurts no one if more gamers get to play the games. Why does it matter or affect an Xbox gamer if their game could be played by others. Same goes for PlayStation. That’s why PC get...