Why was this franchise never criticized for randomness. It's about characters similar to ones from Square Enix (as opposed to ones already from Square Enix) teaming up with Disney characters. And the titles, don't get me started on the titles.
Remember last year, Reggie was all like "Oh yeah, the eShop is good blah blah blah people buy more games then they wanted too".
Why does everyone like the old DKC better. It was slow-pased and boring compared to DKCR.
The winner is whoever your favorite game company is.
Mario or Kirby for Nickelodoen or Nicktoons Network.
Good idea. I can't believe I didn't think of that.
There's no way this is legit. But I'd love for it to turn out to be just because it would be so shocking.
I actually think it's better to do less brand new ones. People are always complaining that the new Pokemon are stupid or unoriginal. At least when it's a new evolution, it looks somewhat similar to a Pokemon you like.
I'm hoping to give Ditto an evolution somehow.
The names being uncustomizable ruins the fun of starting a new Pokemon game, I hope that's fake.
All the time traveling sounds cool. I hope that's true.
The idea of 4 legendaries based off playing cards sounds cool, but some of the ones he described sound silly.
Chespin being a Grass/Flying. Nice.
As for the Pokedex resembling a tablet, I'd hate that. I'd rather it resemble a 3DS.
New type combos: Good idea
Customization: Terrific idea.
Have Pokemon follow you: Useless
Visit old regions: BRILLIANT!!!!!
More content: Terrific idea.
Removing only catch new Pokemon at first: That NEEDS to be done.
Making only a few Legendaries: Lame!
Don't make Fennekin Fire/Fighting: I actually cinda want them to, just because I'm curious how a dog Pokemon's evolution would look like as a fighting type.
Making mo...
Another good idea would be to make one of the Links from one of the timeline splits, and give him a game in one of the other timeline splits. I'm thinking the Link from The Legend of Zelda and Zelda II should get a new game. Although, giving him one in the timeline split he's already in might be better.
I like Super Mario 64, but the castle confuses me. There's just so much there I'm never sure where I'm supposed to go.
@chadboban
I am. I don't get why everyone hates motion controls and no one hates the standing up and pointing.
Hope you have fun with Mario U. It's a great game. Except my baby brother broke my disc of it. Which is one of the many reasons cartridges will always be better.
Here's another one: http://www.youtube.com/watc...
I agree with you on Wind Waker. Making it HD ruins the artstyle.
I disagree with you on DKCR. I don't mind motion controls. What I hate is when you have to get up and point the Wii Remote.
I hated it because the levels were too confusing and too difficult. What's your reason?
I had the original version on Wii, but I gave it to a GameStop-like store for a reason I don't know (this game was awesome). I was planning on buying a new copy, but then this was announced Do we know for sure that this 3DS version is just like the original? I already know about the downscaled graphics and the different contorls, but are there any other differences. Is the game shorter? Did they get rid of Cranky's shop or anything like that?
Why isn't this game called Donkey Kong Land Returns?
What are you trying to say?
Why does everyone keep saying this? Nintendo isn't doing very well right now, but they're not doing THAT bad.
But if this were to happen I would hope they'd only make PC games.