All, but one map are symmetrical. I know a lot of people like having maps even for both teams, but IMO they're pretty boring. A map can be asymmetrical and still be fully balanced for both teams.
I'm sure the maps play well though, I just wish they were more creative in the layouts.
What I'm worried about is having a MUCH larger world that has to be traversed to get anywhere. Also the game in general is MUCH harder. WT was annoying, but even with it gone I can see the Platinum taking me probably around 150 hours or more.
Demon's Souls only took 93 hours.
Why does G4 even put these videos out? The gameplay is ALL old and the guy talking doesn't know anything about the game. He is just describing what is on the screen, which we can all see.
Anyways I can't wait for this game myself. I have a feeling it is going to be a long, hard road to get the platinum trophy.
Notice how the game already has a rating. It has to be already out then. I doubt Zombies will be in MW3, (doubt it is rated yet either) so this has to be for Black Ops.
For once I actually agree with you. CoD doesn't need a next-gen console to get better at all. They just need to make a new engine that uses more of the current gen console's power.
It works, but IMO they should have put in some newer games.
Thanks for posting that! The Argonians sure look badass now.
I'm really liking the look of the Khajiits too.
Overall characters just look MUCH better now. They all look different and look how their race should look.
I've never played an ES game before, but I can't wait to get sucked into Skyrim.
IMO the PS3 controller with the "Real Triggers" attachment is better than the 360 controller for ANY game genre.
This is just my opinion though. My hands are super big, so that is probably why the size of the PS3 controller isn't a problem for me. The 360 controller IMO is just too bulky and the stick layout isn't as good. The D-pad is just total garbage as well.
Everyone has their preferences. I don't see why though anyone would buy th...
Lol fooxy is right. Judging a game by an ALPHA version is just stupid. Balancing is one of the last things done.
You are pretty hypocritical of yourself. You will only judge BF3 by what YOU have played, but will accept anything from MW3 no matter who is playing it.
If you're going to compare two games at a least compare them fairly.
Exactly. That game is probably going to surprise EVERYONE. It has probably been around since Sony first sent out dev kits for the PS3.
One thing the article has wrong though is how much of the PS3's power GoWIII uses. The devs NEVER said how much of the system's hardware they're using. They did use 50% of the ENGINE that runs GoWII. So there is more they can do with the engine, but that doesn't mean they can do it on the PS3.
I myself believe ...
I can already see the ads. "Call of Duty: Allied Mobile Force, exclusively on the Playstation Vita. Map packs first on Xbox Live."
Anyways the name is really a mouth full and just doesn't seem legit. It could be a working title though.
We all know CoD is coming to the Vita, but it would be a surprise if Treyarch was the developer. It would be nice if the MP worked cross-platform though.
PC- BF3
Console- Uncharted 3
IMO it is quite obvious already which games will be the new graphics kings. Overall it'll be BF3, but on consoles Uncharted 3 easily shines above all of the others.
Graphics aren't all though. All of them have amazing gameplay and are all very different. They all deserve to be bought this year.
I think something got lost in translation. I believe he meant that whenever another player joins things don't get easier. They'll still be as difficult for all players as if it was only a single person. So essentially the difficulty does go up depending on the amount of players who are helping.
Well that would mean MC would also be a Jedi who can pull things for walls.
It is quite obvious this is Halo 4 due to how the orange soldier looks. His gun is the AR from Halo.
Now the question is if the more sci-fi Jedi like enemy was kept in or have they gone to a more grounded story like the past games?
IMO it isn't. It is just too slow and clunky for one. Uncharted 3 is just more fluid and fun. Players aren't bullet sponges in Uncharted 3 like they are in Gears.
IMO Gears MP is good, but nothing that can be played seriously due to all the BS that happens in it due to glitches and lag.
The MP in Gears has always had potential, but has always failed. Hopefully the MP in Gears 3 works fine at launch, but I myself am done with the series's MP....
I myself have had nothing but trouble with Turtle Beaches. I'm not going to ever be buying them again.
I'll check those out though.
The only issue I have is the crash. It was just so boring looking. The jet stopped in place and then blew up.
I'm hoping in the full game it'll keep it's momentum and have pieces go flying across the battlefield.
I just hope jets work well on the console versions with the smaller player cap.
I myself never thought Gears 3 ever had a chance of being a better looking game. It does look amazing, but ND just always does so much more. IMO ND is one of the most talented devs in the industry ATM. What they do with the PS3's tech is just amazing. I can't wait to see what they'll do on the PS4.
Both games will look amazing and are both must buys, but from a visual standpoint Uncharted 3 easily wins. Gameplaywise they're both totally different. I myse...
What are you talking about? There isn't any desert shown in the video. This is all pre-alpha footage too. The game looks pretty good for how early it is.
Anyways this'll be a day one buy for me.
Lol these devs are so high of themselves. They're average at best, but they think they're better than everyone else. The games they make are some of the lowest quality wise in the industry.
I'm NEVER going to support another CoD title in my life. All these sequels are just cheap rehashes. The devs are just way too full of themselves as well.
ND could very easily make an FPS that destroys CoD in quality.