All Channels
Popular

kingduqc

Member
CRank: 5Score: 42800

cause their 770 and 780 where not competitive on price and their lower end segment is about dead on

4606d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

no it does not...

4606d ago 2 agree0 disagreeView comment

^^Clueless console gamer.

4606d ago 2 agree3 disagreeView comment

Consoles will cost you more then 400$...

400$ for the console
350$ for online fees
about 10-20 each game you ever buy on consoles( that can add up to 100-150$ yer year, so like 1000$ saved vs pc.

This add man, if you don't take all the cost into consideration it's not a fair deal.

Yes with 750$ you can buy a much stronger pc then the ps4 that will outdo it in the next 7-8 years. Actually you will probably save TONS mon...

4606d ago 11 agree2 disagreeView comment

I dont see any reason to play multiplat on consoles really, they look bad and framerate isnt smooth

4607d ago 4 agree1 disagreeView comment

Consoles gamer be like "Hahahhaha xbone 720p"

meanwhile they have been playing sub 720p for 7 years now and where like "ugggh, who care about nice resolution on pc"

2 faced faggots..

4607d ago 3 agree0 disagreeView comment

welcome console gamer to 2006 lol

4607d ago 6 agree8 disagreeView comment

Nvidia is trying to add value to their cards and incite you to buy new one...

SHOCKER

wow

they suck

lol, freaking retards here..

4607d ago 5 agree0 disagreeView comment

Yeah nobody cares about pc beside the 600 millions pc gamer across the word....

Don't know for you but 2560*1440 max detai > 1920*1080 medium details no matter how you look at it.

4608d ago 2 agree2 disagreeView comment

Nope... 35-40% isn't a big deal. All games can be made on both platform, resolution can be a bit lower but it does not change the core of the game.

4608d ago 0 agree12 disagreeView comment

there is plenty of games that a680 isn't enough for max detail in 1080p, yet alone in 2560*1440...

who are you to say what people should or should not buy

4608d ago 2 agree1 disagreeView comment

Good for me then

gtx 670

4608d ago 1 agree0 disagreeView comment

I love how much more is used here... 40% Isn't much more powerful...

200-250%, now we are talking. Kinda like a 290x vs a ps4 gpu. about 200-225% difference.

4608d ago 2 agree33 disagreeView comment

Ram does not compute or make calculation, it's only memory...

4608d ago 4 agree8 disagreeView comment

Sony and microsoft went full retard with the HDD space... 500gb is so small. On top of that they put slow ass 2.5 inch 5200 rpg Hard drive in these... If it was 3.5 inch you could upgrade for cheap to 3-4 tb but NOOOO they had to chose the worst hard drive they can think of for the consumer.

4608d ago 0 agree2 disagreeView comment

BTW guys:

5-35C is the temperature of the room a ps4 should operate... not the processor temperature. I though that was pretty obvious but I guess people on n4g aren't really away of what i'd call tech savy.

Nothing new here, no speed or specification. Gimped 7850 with a slow 1.8 Ghz cpu is what the ps4 is. Quite impressive for 400$ (sony take a minimal lost I think) But nothing groundbreaking like the ps3 was at it's time.

7 year...

4609d ago 6 agree7 disagreeView comment

Aweful list

Bioware, ubisoft and bethesda.

hahahahha

4609d ago 1 agree0 disagreeView comment

This has nothing to do with monitor refresh hertz, how it has anything to do with G sync...

4609d ago 6 agree0 disagreeView comment

Love how dev still got to confirm things that is a standard since 2006... Man those slow ass consoles really slowing us down.

4610d ago 0 agree9 disagreeView comment

blablabla

we got low end gpu form 2011

blalbalba

sony pays bills so we say nice things

blalbalba

we got a slow ass cpu but we dont talk about it

blablabla

We might get 1080p for a few games

blablabla

framerate will be the same in 4 years

blablabla

hope we can get 30 fps on games this times

bl...

4611d ago 4 agree3 disagreeView comment