not really, Call of Duty is todays most realistic approach at gameplay and the most enjoyable to what reason I have no idea and that's why you have everyone taking the same approach at CODs gameplay style at some different level of quality.
Halo Reach is no problem, even though I sold my PS3, I know for a fact KZ2 was one of my top 5 favorite games along with MGS4. I honestly don't know about Cryteks chance to make millions in the tens because, there simply isn't as much publicity and excitement for this game as there is for something that says Halo and COD.
But, if they bump that up and throw a nanosuit on a mountain dew can, you've got some shit goin down.
tell me about it, someone said it before but, it's without a doubt that without IW and more importantly, the original minds behind modern warfare, COD is down the drain and pumpin millions.
It really depends because, if you're a PC gamer, you can tell whether or not a game is designed to revolve around a certain frame rate and I believe it's probably the pace of the game and more importantly, the animation that allows a pass in 30 FPS unlike a Call of Duty game where the games pace and animation is completely unplayable and makes you throw up if you're getting anything lower than 56fps.
The best example of a game that is designed to be played in 30F...
lol yea hella people talk shit about MOH when they never even played the game, especially single players graphics omg amazing. except for that gay 2nd level where you're in the truck getting blasted.
hidden agenda
they effed up the the pc version by a mile. they shoulda charged us 20 bux for it
lol i had it for 360 first and the graphics were ugly and then I got it for PC this morning and I'm running it on my 1080p TV maxed out graphics and it's still ugly LOL a little sharper but, i guess its not the screen resolution thats messed up only but, everything else aha
sheeeeeeit, microsoft should just buy Activision and fire bobby kotick and make a Halo Call of Duty game. Then you would have the best video gameplay + storyline.
well i mean... the game is created by a developing team that made 2 games that killed the Call of Duty franchise so that makes 3.
I honestly gotta admit... it's gotta be because, they failed to throw in captain price. Him and his big mustache. I bet with him in the game, it would receive a 10
wow I take that back, if you really look at the pictures, there's alot of higher resolution textures like the dirt and the trees. The dirt isn't just a flat carpet and the trees aren't a bunch of paper cut branches
lol its exactly the same aside from the higher resolution.
holy crap the PS3 looks like playing from a dude who got his retinas ripped out.
this game is good, slightly worse than COD4 and MW2.
nope, quit the ad hominem, you'll get beat up in real life for personally talking shit.
And you can testify all that by not even playing the game or playing the game for a few minutes. gtfo
and you have to buy $15 zombie map packs since it only comes with 2 maps. Did I forget to mention that they decided to bring back the "NAZI" zombies? Why the eff would I want nazi zombies.
Black Ops isn't as good as the MW series but, still a good game.
They should have done away with the psychotic/schizophrenic storyline and characters. The Multiplayer is straight up ballsack, the guns are ugly, sound terrible and the maps are the typical Treyarch bs.
Zombies is fun.
Single Player might give some of you a seizure playing it.
Multiplayer is ruined but, better than WAW.
lol don't be jelous, I thought medal of honor single player was better and medal of honor single player wasn't that great either.
man this game is overhyped, the single player is barely anymore funner than Halo reach's boring single player. Multiplayer is downgraded to treyarchs level of skill.
lol fandboys