These guys are the masters of patience! That is why we get a game from nearly every series that they publish every year!
Lets see for 2010....
Call of Duty: Check
Tony Hawk: Check
Guitar Hero: Check
For me, videogames is one of the few things that I am interested in. I do not have any hobbies really. One thing that I do not like is how this kinda says that if you play videogames a lot, then you are a mindless drone and that is all you can do. Yeah, I play videogames a lot. Because they are fun. That is a bit like how somebody who plays tennis a lot because they think that it is fun, but for some reason they are not considered drones themselves.
Whoa, that actually bec...
Like many others have said, this is obvious. It is an arcade competetive shooter, of course the 360 version will get more sales.
I [Emphasize]MIGHT[/Emphasize] get Black Ops down the road, mainly for the theatre mode, but only used. I am not supporting Bobby Kotick in any way.
Wow, that was sooooo on topic. Because we ALL know that the Kinect has plenty to do with Call of Duty. Yep. So true. /S!!!
Will you just shut up? Oh wait, your out of bubbles. Nevermind.
Or perhaps this particular reviewer does not agree with the "popular opinion"? Not everyone is going to like this game. Get over it.
Just shut up. Your trolling reaks of fail.
Millions of other people are still paying a lot of money for broken products and they do it blindly. How ironic.
Actually, they did give WAW a 4 out of 5. Here is the weird part though, they didn't give it a 5 because it felt a bit too much like Call of Duty 4. Think about that for a second and then take a look at this game.
You made the exact same comment in a different topic. I sense a trend coming along.
Why is it that every argument to defend this game comes down to userbase? The gameplay is incredibly simple, that is why so many people play it. Would YOU really give this game a 9 or above? And yes, I know that every shooter has problems, but this has so many problems that it does not deserve anywhere near a 9, let alone a perfect score that some idiots have given it.
I am on it every so often. It is great for meeting new people, and it is FREE. Whats not to like?
Any review of this game that gets a score like this, I put into question. I do not see how any review could give this game a 9 or above. This game, AT THE HIGHEST, should get a 7.0. Probably less. I just do not see the massive appeal with it. Kill, die, kill, die, kill, die, somebody gets killstreak, die, die, die, die, die, die, die, die, die, die, nuke, done.
Well, not every achievement has to be skill based. I just think that it would have increased the fun value, due to the kills just constantly racking up. I still would not have it yet, but at least I would know that I am making progress.
I think Left 4 Dead and Prototype had the right idea for these. Getting 53,000+ in ONE playthrough on Dead Rising is hell, far too much spamming. They made the same mistake with DR2. I think that there should have been an overall kill counter on the status screen. I really think it is just idiotic to make us spam nonstop just to get 72,000 kills.
The Eyetoy did not have "controls" either. Are you trying to say first concept without controllERS??? Okay, once again, Eyetoy came before Kinect.
1. They did not mention that playing online with other people and the 'features' like Facebook and such is NOT FREE.
2. They are acting as if the 360 is the ONLY console that can do these things.
3. They did not mention that you will probably have to spend an extra $100+ for a hard drive for the music and movies. 4GB will not last long I assure you.
I know there are more, but these just bother me.
What bothers me is all of the money that is just being thrown around. Howcome they are not using money like this to make more games for the 360 itself?
A $500 Million campaign for this???? You how many good ways that this money could be spent?
I am American, and I am sorry, but this country is full of blind idiots. Hell, it really isn't even for this. It is obvious.