Yeah, ok qwerty, or pandatrollmobill, continue living in your denial world, we, gamers, are playing the best games, with best graphics ;)
Who can disagree with facts ?
oh, i see, butthurt fanboyz in denial.
"old" but much powerfull than the competition in 2006 (used for supercomputers = to 46 pentium 4 terraflops !! not a single 2006/7 can compete), so you can have that kind of graphic in 2011.
"fairy disagree" So many denial xfans here, with their multiaccounts, i understand why they are always butthurt, but please....
on the lens of lies stupid comparisons show, it's like npd article, they are in full force, like blind sheeps, forgetting they inferior experience for a moment :)
ahahaha even planet xbox says :
"the PS3 does appear to be the most capable of reaching proximity with the PC despite reaching a 720p resolution as opposed to the 360’s 1080p resolution."
another proof that lot is worst than a biased xbox blog.
even planet xbox say : "the PS3 does appear to be the most capable of reaching proximity with the PC despite reaching a 720p resolution as opposed to the 360’s 1080p resolution."
so, lol.
lens of lies are never serious, they are just a bunch of fanboyz satisfying other believers fanboyz (with imaginary superior versions, they try to forget all great, and the best, exclusives they can't play)
BF3 has free tickets too, if you compare kz3, R3 treatment, both have way better single player, and great multis, but the scores are sometimes inferior to cod or bf : double standards.
..yep, because if you have paid for this, then use it.. (but no reason to pay and play on xbox nowadays)
by the way, don't try to spin the facts with useless arguments :
" the PS3 does appear to be the most capable of reaching proximity with the PC despite reaching a 720p resolution as opposed to the 360’s 1080p resolution."
All the things concerning servers, psn, lag, etc are pure bullcraps, they just don't accept the reality and try to find some superior things, pathetic :)
"the PS3 does appear to be the most capable of reaching proximity with the PC despite reaching a 720p resolution as opposed to the 360’s 1080p resolution."
360 = 720P also ( but clearly inferior, if a guy from planetxbox says that, you can believe it xfans)
Metacritic and others game rankings should not count the 20 worst, and the 20 best of the 200 reviews, it's the solution to ignore biased reviews and have a less biased metascore.
this game deserve that...and more if you consider other games had some 10, or 9.
The foolish thing is to believe they are not bias since they gave a few exclusives some high score.
a guy has already given the proof they are biased toward ps3, nobody can deny the fact : it's easy, check all the ps3 exclusives scores from edges, and compare it to gameranking or metacritics (even with biased reviews inside !) than do the same thing with nintendo and xbox exclusives...you'll see.
You cand add 1 to 3 points on each ps3 exclusives scores from edge, so it's a 10 ;)
"Butthurt fanboys"
probably, each time they have to accept the sad reality (for them) they are in total denial mode, including stealth disagree (for facts).
Gamingbolt = LOL
nitpickers are coming ! (like for all big ps3 exclusives)
...you are right, since "best on ps3" automaticly means best graphics on consoles.
Do you a favor, don't bring gears (great for 360, everyone agree) in a uncharted 3 (or even 2) article, it's not the same league.
Forget the pictures, and try to look at gameplay (desert, horses, etc) it's just another king, better than uncharted2, and only possible on ps3 (or pc).
...and it's vgchartz, always undertracking ps3 consoles and soft (but again first, consoles and softs ;))
Biased media and brainwashed us xbox users helped a lot too...
lol@ridiculous psn/xbl argument : the difference ? one is free.