I REALLY hope it's not one of those Wii rail shooter games. Those games sucked and Capcom is capable of much more. It's probably going to be that PSP Resident Evil game we barely know anything about. That and hopefully they'll release RE1-3 as a remastered collection and release it before RE4 and Code Veronica hit PSN and XBLA.
It wasn't a flat out "no" so it gives hope to those who own a PS3, but not a good enough PC to run it or an Xbox 360.
I have it on PC, but if they release it on the PS3, I'd buy it there, too. Why? To support the greatest RPG in recent times.
It is
On your PlayStation 3 or PlayStation Portable navigate to the PlayStation Network icon on the XMB
Log into your PlayStation Network account and choose Account Management > Transaction Management > Services List
Choose “PlayStation Network Promotions” from the list of services displayed
Select either “PS3 Free Games” or “PSP Free Games” and then choose “Select Content”
Idk...I'm buying a 3DS eventually and it would be pretty damn cool to play MGS3 on the go.
PS2 version is definitely better looking. Glad I can buy it in HD come November though.
Based on the title, people will think it's 6-8 on average. The title should say it's based on a speed playthrough.
Lol that's what I'm saying. If anything, it should have scored higher than the first, but I guess they're reviewing this game SOLELY based on WKC2...which seems to suck harder than the first.
I thought it was going to say gym members for some reason, lmao.
What's the point of this? Seems stupid, if you ask me.
Looks a LOT worse than the tech demo shown at last year's E3. Still...I'm buying this along with Zelda and a 3DS when it comes out.
They specifically said November 2011.
That's a good thing. More money for them means better games for us.
It hasn't even 24 hours and already websites are whining about it.
People, the game looks amazing even on low settings. It actually even looks better than anything I've seen on my Xbox 360 so there's really nothing to worry about. Even though this article isn't about graphics, I know that's what people are concerned about.
@I_find_it_funny
But it's a good example. Metro 2033 looked good on the Xbox, but MUCH better on PC and I believe it was better optimized than The Witcher 2 is. Witcher 2 will probably run on low to medium settings with most of the advance things disabled for the sake of frame-rate. However, I'll stick to the PC version because I'm already too used to the 60fps I'm getting.
That's dirty....I'm going to pre-order this game just because of this, lol. That and because I really want it >_>
Gonna upgrade my GPU to try and play this game on medium and high.
Not only was Final Fantasy XIII-2 announced years after Versus XIII, but it will also get a playable demo at E3 and be released in less than a year after it gets announced. This is some serious BS
I already use Steam and I don't want to use another digital distributor; I'd rather have all my games either on Steam or on my bookshelf. Btw, it does suck to pay royalties, but selling more copies helps make up for the losses they make because of the royalty fees and they can see that porting it over wasn't a wasted effort.
Sure people can buy it from GOG, but if they make it for the consoles and console owners buy it, all of the work that went into it can pay of...