I agree with this article. Its brutal, realistic, and endearing.
The art seems strange. I am not sure why.
I hadn't even heard of this.
I am a fan of Marvel.
Still kind of looks cool.
This game looks peaceful. I would like to see it in motion.
The DLC definitely shows promise.
As a PS3 player, it is hard to support a man who has openly bashed the PS3. I think L4D/2 look amazing, but I will never have the chance to play them because of some ridiculous bias the developers have.
They (Valve/Gabe) just hate the PS3. Or maybe they are intimidated by it. Plenty of developers manage to put their games on the big three without any problems, yet here is Valve, one of the biggest developers out there whining about how hard it is.
Nintendo really needs to check themselves. I am surprised they manage to cut a profit through all of this BS.
High-Def is the only way to play. Though, I think MGS4 brought that to my attention first.
A difficult JRPG-style RTS? SIGN ME UP
I know how it is being forced to play a broken title.
It sounds pretty good, too.
I can't get over how ridiculous that screen shot is.
It sure does. I knew the game had issues from my playthrough about five months ago, but it was never this bad.
Its still BS. Microsoft drops checks that sound like bricks when hitting the table.
Seems like the reviewer got more out of this title than the others.
This is still just a rumor, it has not been confirmed.
This review is really in-depth. Its a good read, very thorough, but I am confused as to how these games are approached. The feeling is almost like each title is building towards the next.