Plus don't forget it was the internet mob (which is the dumbest thing) that started all the drama with wanting to boycott over THEIR OWN misconceptions about who fought in the damn war. I loved when they said don't buy it if you don't like it. People act like this was all pushed on them over the top like, I've seen comments from ppl complaining about the Ski fight scenes and they didn't even know there was whole ski Battalions in the war lmao. Yet they're such historic...
I get it, and that's why I said I sensed it was resentment from those things, but then just say it's bc of that. All I've been hearing is how it's not worth 60 bc its incomplete.
So I'm definitely bias as I love the BF series, but my question is(and please don't just flood with disagrees without adding to the discussion) why is it that no one had a problem with Battlefield 1's amount of content? BFV has the same amount of content. Single player war stories, admittedly minus one chapter which we get in a month, and your normal BF multiplayer modes. In fact its starting with one more mode than last year with Grand operations(as this mode wasn't in BF1 at...
The multiplayer is as fun as it's ever been and it's only going to get better. That's what I pulled from the review. It's buggy right now, as per usual for BF. Modes are missing, but are on the way. Now I personally have no problem spending 60 bucks bc it has just as much content as most multiplayer shooters right now but that's just me
There's always an anti COD campaign. There was one this year too. I play both and could care less what other gamers think of them bc they're so love or hate with both that you can't trust fellow gamers with honest opinions. This year's COD was torn up bc no singleplayer with review bombs and gamers swearing it off for good(just like every year) and this years BF was sworn off long ago bc it has chicks and unrealistic cosmetic items for multiplayer. Point being, there's alw...
If people don't like the game then why even comment? The game is out, like it or not. Your time to voice your displeasure has passed so let the rest of us just enjoy and actually be able to discuss the game and trailer without hearing b*tching.
Number one should be "Wait for multiplayer " I know lots like this game but it's obvious there's a significant portion that are disappointed, myself included, that a game of this caliber and pedigree underperformed. And I for one avoided the previews and hype buildup so no that's not the reason behind this dud. Every big new game is open world and rockstars corner on the market has officially passed. The story is basically "we need to find a place to be free" t...
As much of a bad idea as this sounds, I'm going to give Sony the benefit of the doubt that they know what they're doing. And I definitely don't think they'd go to a gimmick like this to put on the forefront of a PS5 launch. But with that said, I have no clue what they could be going for with this
I'm Playstation all the way but it's pretty stupid how you're gonna get a bunch of down votes for saying a clear and innocuous thing like that.
I noticed the legendary pelt one when I lost my legendary bear pelt after taking a tumble with my horse. Then saw that the trapper in the city had it available for crafting anyways. The rest I'm sure most already know though
This is going to flop hard. Once I finally saw actual gameplay, I realized why they had only cinematic trailers
I just like the face Arthur makes when he wins a hand lol. He looks genuinely happy for once and it actually makes me smile haha
I really don't think an hour and 20 minutes is tooo bad. But I'm also used to buying digital and waiting a lot longer so I guess I get it for people who usually buy disc to think it's really long
I feel like running your horse into something and having your horse get shot in a gunfight will be common enough no?
So glad I like my PSN name as is
There was a Norwegian skiing operation in WW2 against the Germans. Operation Gunnerside. Skiing and sleds were the most common means of transportation for the Norwegian army. The Soviets had 11 Ski Battalions lol. I mean this is easy to find stuff guys. And yes, I'm sure it gets exaggerated in the game but sounds a bit nitpicky to say "they didn't throw knives while skiing in WW2" I mean you obviously didn't even know there was skiing in WW2, lol, so obviously your not a...
I'm just worried about Red Dead Online. I loved the first Red Dead's online but after GTA online's big success with MTs and ditching any attention to extending the life of the single player... it would seem logical that they'd do it again. Hopefully not but I guess we'll find out down the road
I mean it's a videogame... one man/woman army is common af. Battlefield 1 was the same way. Pretty sure the Ottoman story was you one woman "armying" an occupied train route. Tanker mission same way for the most important parts. I get what ppl are saying but come on, every "true story" gets exaggerated. If not then we'd be saying how boring things are.
Oh I'm not saying any of it is right or wrong. I'm just saying that gamers won't freak out about this as bad even though this is the only one actually hurting anybody. Reports keep coming in about shady work environments but as long as it's not shady business practices then nobody seems to care. And I'm no different as I already have my RDR2 preordered.
Nah, just boys like you who blow things out of proportion and turn a drop into an ocean. I've been playing the multiplayer for a good ten hours and can attest that when I'm running and gunning and blowing shit up, dying and respawning magically behind my squad mate, self healing bullet wounds in an instant, building big fortifications in a couple seconds, etc...I never once stopped and said" hey, was that a female soldier I just saw?!, that's it! Immersion broken!!" Do y...