What a boring release. Yawn.
Not worth the investment. Minor upgrade vs. what we should be seeing.
We shall see. ''Grabs popcorn".
I've said it once, I'll say it again. This will be nothing more than a fad like 3D television, or playing casual games on Kinect, Wii, and Move. Not worth the investment.
Two to three years down the road you won't need at PS4 since PS Neo or PS5 will be out. Who on earth would buy one that far down the road when it will be obsolete.
They all got hit by cars looking for Pokemon and not paying attention to where they were going.
The PS 4 slim looks like the PS 4 without the parallelogram look. Not much creativity went into it, that's for sure. Pretty boring refresh.
First of all these two games need to quit being compared to one another when they are so different. Second, COD is in dire need of an overhaul. I lost interest long ago. Just my opinion.
What a waste of money for the next fad that will go the way of 3D television.
Is it just me or did all these exclusive articles and arguments start up again when Sony fans realized they are on borrowed time to brag about the power of their system hardware. Don't get me wrong, I like both systems but the fanboys of one system over the other make it too obvious they're only picking the wars they know they can win, plus all these arguments are old. Move on to something new please. I'm done reading nothing but arguments about exclusives and resolution differ...
It's used and at a pawn shop. Don't be surprised. Just check all used devices before giving them to your kids. Not sure how an article gets made about this. Kinda common sense which I know is lacking in most people.
Yeah, just like people take time out of their day to post meaningless comments such as yours.
I've been playing Battlefield games since 1942. I'm personally open to anything from WW2 to future as BF 2142 was a blast back on the PC. I'm torn on how creative they can be using the WW1 era. Don't think there could be a lot to it. They've been continuing to support BF4 for years now. Don't think the same thing could happen with a WW1 game. As someone said, probably best if it were a DLC pack for something like that. Battlefield games have always been a day on...
Impressions???. You hardly talked about anything besides it being episodic and if that matters. Not a good review.
In case you didn't pick up on it, that was sarcasm. I've built and owned gaming PCs. While anyone with common sense should know they are more powerful than consoles, it just makes me laugh to hear the comparisons in this forum from PC folks just to prove there's a difference and justify their pricy investment, hence my jab with the sarcasm. All of this was typed at 60FPS.
I see more snow on her jacket in the PC version so it has to be the best version to have. I'm on new egg now to spend $1,300 on a new gaming PC to see the extra snow.
Some people need their eyes checked. Identical on both systems.
Regardless FPS of 30 vs. 60 is more noticable than resolution when comparing 720 or 900 vs. 1080p.
Not true at all unless you're playing on a TV that is 50in or better and even then it's hard to tell the difference. FPS on the other hand is easily noticeable.
I understand the definition. Perhaps you should also. Not their best showing by far.