No one is saying 900p is unplayable or bad. It's bad that they're not trying their hardest to provide the best experience they can on PS4. Instead they're trying to please MS suits. If you were a PC owner who owned a more powerful rig than Xbox One would you want them to cap the PC version? It's one of the perks of PS4 and they're robbing us of it for the sake of MS money. Bad principle. Nothing to do with what's more playable but more about what is acceptable as...
It is Ubisoft's responsibility to provide the best they can for each console. If a game looks the same on PS4 and Xbox One that means they're not doing that. That's bad customer service. Speak with your wallets against them shortchanging PS4 owners people!
and this practice will still be fundamentally wrong. A man doesn't lose enjoyment if a game is 720p vs. 1080p but if they use the console's to their full potential the Xbox and PS4 versions should not be the same. Part of the lure of buying a more powerful system is the fact that you get better 3rd party games. Ubisoft has robbed us of that right and must be punished.
If they say PS4 and Xbox One are only capable of having the same resolution and framerate as they claim in this statement later, they aren't being honest. A man is boycotting not because of the resolution changing his enjoyment of the game, but because of the simple fact that parity is wrong.
Punish them by boycotting the game. If you speak with your wallets they will listen. A man will personally be not buying it not because resolution matters a great deal but because parity is wrong.
It's a shame. A man loves his PS4 but WiiU has been good as well. Mario Kart is a blast and a man only wishes the 3DS and WiiU dates had been reversed. Not getting WiiU Smash until the 21 will suck.
he would probably downplay PS4 numbers as VGChartz being not accurate. Though VGChartz has consistently undertracked Ps4 compared to what it really is and has frequently had to adjust after the fact to compensate (for instance when Sony announced 10m sell through they were still at 9.3m or something)
and with the launch of all those countries dying off the China launch will be unable to make up for it. PS4 has lead every week this year something even Wii couldn't do for an entire calendar year. Perhaps November will bring the first deviation from this pattern.
AC4 was 1080p and if it's even with Xbox then it's not using the PS4 to its full potential. Sorry but it's either laziness or trying to appeal to Xbox at the expense of PS4 owners (expense as in they're not getting the most out of the game on their system so they're not getting as much as they easily could from their $60). Sorry but there's no defending what Phil is doing here a man just lost a lot of respect for him. Better RAM and GPU has to go somewhere.
They won't mess it up if people punish Ubi for doing this. Buy used or don't buy at all when a company deserves it. A man was excited for this game and thinks it'll be great but can't bring himself to support these practices and holding PS4 back.
Ridiculous. A man may skip entirely and if he does it will be used. No need to support MS not letting companies get the most out of each system. A man thought Phil was going to put an end to this idiotic practice.
*mr. Burns voice* excellent
No no no. Cinematic games, even open world ones, are always highly replayable. A man only keeps certain games that he knows he can go back to once a year at least and enjoy the ride again. That is why Infamous SS has made its way into that exclusive club (most are re-sold on ebay). It's like enjoying a great movie a second time. You know the end but the ride is as enjoyable as ever.
Why do people start worrying about sequels when a game JUST came out (or even before it comes out sometimes nowadays)? Just enjoy it and if a sequel comes then great but that's a thing to think about at E3 or something. Just enjoy the moment please!
A man is still pissed that Smash for 3DS coming out now and Smash for WiiU isn't coming out till Nov 21 possibly. That's just terrible! The 3DS version is infinitely less appealing the game is better with 4 players on a big screen! Why not release it sooner and give a man more time with it instead of releasing JUST before BF!?
In addition to a man's earlier adjustments SF4 should be replaced with Skyrim or Batman Arkham Asylum. Then again a man values how great a game is over how much it "revolutionized the industry" or whatever. A man doesn't care if you did it first or fifth if you did it best. It's often the more refined versions that took inspiration from past games that man ends up enjoying and going back to more (Resistance 3 over 1, Ratchet and Clank ACiT over 2, Uncharted 3 over 2, ...
A man would swap Portal (played through that game and felt absolutely nothing for it) for Uncharted 3 (yes 3) and Bayonetta for Ratchet and Clank A Crack in Time.
COD 4 actually had a good SP and reinvented online MP. It deserves a spot.
How was a man moronic?
A man said he buys the games based on quality and trophies are always a "nice if it's there" kind of thing but was just making the point that this makes no sense when the first one was impossible to miss. A man only goes for them if they're fun and then they provide some extra replay value (just like regular extras did back in the day before trophies)
and what if the PC version was capped for the sake of PS4 having parity with it? No way that would sit well. Same principal at work here. A more powerful platform being held back due to less powerful platforms makes for a very backwards industry.